Literature DB >> 21638188

Laparoscopic implantation of neural electrodes on pelvic nerves: an experimental study on the obturator nerve in a chronic minipig model.

Benoit Rabischong1, Demetrio Larraín, Pierre Rabischong, Revaz Botchorishvili, Georges Fraisse, Stephane Gallego, Philippe Gaydier, Jean Michel Chardigny, Paul Avan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic exposure of pelvic nerves has opened a new area in the field of neuromodulation. However, electrode design and material deterioration remain issues that limit clinical application. The objective of this study was to evaluate experimentally the laparoscopic implantation of different types of neural electrodes in order to achieve functional and selective electrical stimulation of pelvic nerves.
METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study of the laparoscopic implantation and tolerance and efficacy of three monopolar cuff electrodes implanted on the obturator nerve in ten Göttingen minipigs (18-20 months old; 14.5-24 kg body weight). Animals were allocated to two groups. A 3-mm-diameter laparoscopic instrument was used during dissection of paravesical fossa and obturator nerve on both sides in order to minimize nerve damage. In all animals, a "split-cylinder" cuff electrode was implanted around the left obturator nerve. On the right side, a "lasso" cuff electrode was implanted in the first group and a "closed-cylinder" cuff was implanted in the second group. Electrical stimulation (0-5 V, 20 Hz) was performed for implanted electrodes on days 0, 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90. Current intensity thresholds were identified by palpation of muscle contraction. Strength developed according to stimulation level and was measured using weight transducers.
RESULTS: All procedures were performed by laparoscopy. Mean operative times differed significantly among groups, the shortest being for split-cylinder electrodes (P = 0.0002). No electrical spread phenomena were observed. Initial thresholds were below 1.5 V (range = 0.5-1.3); however, a significant rise was observed, with time to a maximum of 2.7 V (P < 0.0001). Only split-cylinder electrodes remained functional after 3 months. The mean value of maximum strength remained stable during the study period (P = 0.21, NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to implanting neuroprostheses seems to be very attractive. Furthermore, this approach could allow highly selective nerve stimulation to be achieved using simpler devices such as split-cylinder monopolar electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21638188     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1750-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III.

Authors:  M Possover; S Stöber; K Plaul; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Neural prostheses.

Authors:  A Prochazka; V K Mushahwar; D B McCreery
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  An implantable neuroprosthesis for standing and walking in paraplegia: 5-year patient follow-up.

Authors:  David Guiraud; Thomas Stieglitz; Klaus Peter Koch; Jean-Louis Divoux; Pierre Rabischong
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Time course of tissue remodelling and electrophysiology in the rat sciatic nerve after spiral cuff electrode implantation.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Thil; Dai Tran Duy; Ides M Colin; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 5.  Surgical anatomy and dissection techniques for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  N Kadar
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  An advanced neuroprosthesis for restoration of hand and upper arm control using an implantable controller.

Authors:  P Hunter Peckham; Kevin L Kilgore; Michael W Keith; Anne M Bryden; Niloy Bhadra; Fred W Montague
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 7.  A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems.

Authors:  Xavier Navarro; Thilo B Krueger; Natalia Lago; Silvestro Micera; Thomas Stieglitz; Paolo Dario
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Laparoscopic endopelvic sacral implantation of a Brindley controller for recovery of bladder function in a paralyzed patient.

Authors:  M Possover; J Baekelandt; A Kaufmann; V Chiantera
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  The Laparoscopic Implantation of Neuroprothesis (LION) Procedure to Control Intractable Abdomino-Pelvic Neuralgia.

Authors:  Marc Possover; Jan Baekelandt; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2007-01

10.  Laparoscopy shortens length of stay in patients with gastric electrical stimulators.

Authors:  Amar Al-Juburi; Stephanie Granger; James Barnes; Guy Voeller; Derrick Beech; Hosein Amiri; Thomas L Abell
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Real-time, label-free, intraoperative visualization of peripheral nerves and micro-vasculatures using multimodal optical imaging techniques.

Authors:  Jaepyeong Cha; Aline Broch; Scott Mudge; Kihoon Kim; Jung-Man Namgoong; Eugene Oh; Peter Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Laparoscopic placement of a tined lead electrode on the pudendal nerve with urodynamic monitoring of bladder function during electrical stimulation: an acute experimental study in healthy female pigs.

Authors:  Elena E Foditsch; Bogdan Hoinoiu; Günter Janetschek; Reinhold P Zimmermann
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-06-24

Review 3.  Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review.

Authors:  Kadir A Yildiz; Alexander Y Shin; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.