Literature DB >> 11328963

Soa genotype selectively affects mouse gustatory neural responses to sucrose octaacetate.

M Inoue1, X Li, S A McCaughey, G K Beauchamp, A A Bachmanov.   

Abstract

In mice, behavioral acceptance of the bitter compound sucrose octaacetate (SOA) depends on allelic variation of a single gene, Soa. The SW.B6-Soa(b)congenic mouse strain has the genetic background of an "SOA taster" SWR/J strain and an Soa-containing donor chromosome fragment from an "SOA nontaster" C57BL/6J strain. Using microsatellite markers polymorphic between the two parental strains, we determined that the donor fragment spans 5-10 cM of distal chromosome 6. The SWR/J mice avoided SOA in two-bottle tests with water and had strong responses to SOA in two gustatory nerves, the chorda tympani (CT) and glossopharyngeal (GL). In contrast, the SW.B6-Soa(b) mice were indifferent to SOA in two-bottle tests and had very weak responses to SOA in both of these nerves. The SWR/J and SW.B6-Soa(b) mice did not differ in responses of either nerve to sucrose, NaCl, HCl, or the bitter-tasting stimuli quinine, denatonium, strychnine, 6-n-propylthiouracil, phenylthiocarbamide, and MgSO(4). Thus the effect of the Soa genotype on SOA avoidance is mediated by peripheral taste responsiveness to SOA, involving taste receptor cells innervated by both the CT and GL nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11328963      PMCID: PMC3653171          DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.2001.5.4.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  20 in total

1.  Sucrose consumption in mice: major influence of two genetic loci affecting peripheral sensory responses.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; Y Ninomiya; M Inoue; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains.

Authors:  P Markel; P Shu; C Ebeling; G A Carlson; D L Nagle; J S Smutko; K J Moore
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Sucrose octaacetate avoidance in nontaster mice is not enhanced by two type-A Prp transgenes from taster mice.

Authors:  D B Harder; E A Azen; G Whitney
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Behavioral specificity of the bitter taste gene Soa.

Authors:  J D Boughter; G Whitney
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-12-31

Review 5.  Chorda tympani responses in two inbred strains of mice with different taste preferences.

Authors:  M E Frank; D A Blizard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999-08

6.  A novel family of mammalian taste receptors.

Authors:  E Adler; M A Hoon; K L Mueller; J Chandrashekar; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse.

Authors:  H Matsunami; J P Montmayeur; L B Buck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Chromosome mapping of Soa, a gene influencing gustatory sensitivity to sucrose octaacetate in mice.

Authors:  C G Capeless; G Whitney; E A Azen
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  A common polygenic basis for quinine and PROP avoidance in mice.

Authors:  D B Harder; G Whitney
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Cycloheximide: no ordinary bitter stimulus.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Bradley K Formaker; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Comparison of differences between PWD/PhJ and C57BL/6J mice in calcium solution preferences and chorda tympani nerve responses.

Authors:  Chandra M Cherukuri; Stuart A McCaughey; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-01-08

5.  Rats are unable to discriminate quinine from diverse bitter stimuli.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Kristen E Kay; Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Taste function in mice with a targeted mutation of the pkd1l3 gene.

Authors:  Theodore M Nelson; Nelson D Lopezjimenez; Lino Tessarollo; Masashi Inoue; Alexander A Bachmanov; Susan L Sullivan
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Gustatory neural responses to umami taste stimuli in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects behavioral and neural taste responses to sweeteners in the F2 hybrids between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; Danielle R Reed; Xia Li; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Variation in nicotine consumption in inbred mice is not linked to orosensory ability.

Authors:  A Rebecca Glatt; Kelley Denton; John D Boughter
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Genetics of mouse behavioral and peripheral neural responses to sucrose.

Authors:  Cailu Lin; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Natalia P Bosak; Yutaka Ishiwatari; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.