Literature DB >> 9669045

A common polygenic basis for quinine and PROP avoidance in mice.

D B Harder1, G Whitney.   

Abstract

Inbred strains of mice (Mus musculus) differ greatly in ability to taste various bitter compounds. For some compounds, the differences result from allelic variation at a single locus. However, segregation patterns incompatible with monogenic inheritance have been found for quinine avoidance. The Soa bitter sensitivity locus exerts some influence on this phenotype, but an unknown number of other loci also contribute. Relative avoidance patterns for quinine sulfate in panels of naive inbred strains resembled avoidance patterns for 6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil (PROP), suggesting a common genetic basis. In particular, C57BL/6J mice strongly avoided both 0.1 mM quinine sulfate and 1 mM PROP in two-bottle preference tests, whereas C3H/HeJ mice were indifferent to both. Therefore, 12 BXH/Ty recombinant inbred strains, derived from these strains, were tested with both solutions to begin identification of the unknown bitter loci. Naive mice were tested for four consecutive days with each compound (order counterbalanced). Some BXH/Ty strain means resembled those of the parent strains, but others were intermediate. This indicated recombination among loci affecting avoidance, and therefore polygenic inheritance. The strain means were highly correlated across compounds (r = 0.98), suggesting that the same polygenes controlled both phenotypes. The BXH/Ty means for both compounds were then compared with the strain genotypes at 212 chromosome position markers distributed throughout the genome. Eight markers on five chromosomes (3, 6, 7, 8 and 9) yielded significant correlations. Six of the markers were correlated with both phenotypes, again suggesting common polygenic inheritance. The marker with the highest correlation was Prp, tightly linked to Soa on chromosome 6. The correlated marker regions likely contain quantitative trait loci affecting bitter avoidance. The phenotypic similarity of PROP to quinine, rather than to phenylthiourea, apparently stemming from a common polygenic basis, indicates a difference between mice and humans in gustatory organization related to bitters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9669045     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.3.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  12 in total

1.  Soa genotype selectively affects mouse gustatory neural responses to sucrose octaacetate.

Authors:  M Inoue; X Li; S A McCaughey; G K Beauchamp; A A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 2.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

3.  Mapping of QTLs for oral alcohol self-administration in B6.C and B6.I quasi-congenic RQI strains.

Authors:  Csaba Vadasz; Mariko Saito; Beatrix M Gyetvai; Melinda Oros; Istvan Szakall; Krisztina M Kovacs; Vidudala V T S Prasad; Grant Morahan; Reka Toth
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 4.  The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception.

Authors:  S W Guo; D R Reed
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Residual chemosensory capabilities in double P2X2/P2X3 purinergic receptor null mice: intraoral or postingestive detection?

Authors:  Robert M Hallock; Marco Tatangelo; Jennell Barrows; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  The relationship between PROP and ethanol preferences: an evaluation of 4 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Theresa L White; Laura V Dishaw; Paul R Sheehe; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hansen; Danielle R Reed; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Comprehensive Analysis of Mouse Bitter Taste Receptors Reveals Different Molecular Receptive Ranges for Orthologous Receptors in Mice and Humans.

Authors:  Kristina Lossow; Sandra Hübner; Natacha Roudnitzky; Jay P Slack; Federica Pollastro; Maik Behrens; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The perception of quinine taste intensity is associated with common genetic variants in a bitter receptor cluster on chromosome 12.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Paul A S Breslin; Fujiko F Duke; Anjali K Henders; Megan J Campbell; Grant W Montgomery; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  Behavioral genetics and taste.

Authors:  John D Boughter; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.