Literature DB >> 11322529

The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation: models and measurements.

A J Matsuoka1, J T Rubinstein, P J Abbas, C A Miller.   

Abstract

It is known that some cochlear implant users have improved speech perception using higher rates of interleaved pulsatile stimulation. There are, however, significant limitations on their performance presumably due in part to temporal and spatial interactions. To address these limitations, we have examined refractory characteristics of the auditory nerve using experimental animal models and computational simulations. A stochastic model of the node of Ranvier modified for mammalian sodium channel kinetics has been developed to calculate the masked input-output (I/O) functions for different interpulse intervals (IPI) [26]. The model is based upon 1000 voltage-gated sodium channels and incorporates parameters such as nodal resistance and capacitance. The relative spread (RS) [35] calculated from the I/O functions was typically 0.03 for 17 different IPIs between 450 micros and 6 ms for cathodal stimuli. For IPI = 830 and 870 micros, the RS was ten times greater than those for other IPIs. Although it is not fully understood how the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) data are related to single fiber data, the RS of single fibers is a partial contributor [19]. We have measured the EAP using a monopolar intracochlear stimulating electrode and a recording electrode placed directly on the nerve and have observed changes in slope of EAP growth functions consistent with the theoretical RS values. These results have significant implications for speech coding in a cochlear implant since they suggest an increased membrane noise for pulse trains of specific rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11322529     DOI: 10.1109/10.915706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  14 in total

1.  Effects of high-rate electrical stimulation upon firing in modelled and real neurons.

Authors:  V Krauthamer; T Crosheck
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

Review 4.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

5.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Dynamical instability determines the effect of ongoing noise on neural firing.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; John A White; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24

7.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

8.  An exact stochastic hybrid model of excitable membranes including spatio-temporal evolution.

Authors:  Evelyn Buckwar; Martin G Riedler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Temporal coding by cochlear nucleus bushy cells in DBA/2J mice with early onset hearing loss.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-26

10.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.