Literature DB >> 11320234

Pitch perception: a dynamical-systems perspective.

J H Cartwright1, D L González, O Piro.   

Abstract

Two and a half millennia ago Pythagoras initiated the scientific study of the pitch of sounds; yet our understanding of the mechanisms of pitch perception remains incomplete. Physical models of pitch perception try to explain from elementary principles why certain physical characteristics of the stimulus lead to particular pitch sensations. There are two broad categories of pitch-perception models: place or spectral models consider that pitch is mainly related to the Fourier spectrum of the stimulus, whereas for periodicity or temporal models its characteristics in the time domain are more important. Current models from either class are usually computationally intensive, implementing a series of steps more or less supported by auditory physiology. However, the brain has to analyze and react in real time to an enormous amount of information from the ear and other senses. How is all this information efficiently represented and processed in the nervous system? A proposal of nonlinear and complex systems research is that dynamical attractors may form the basis of neural information processing. Because the auditory system is a complex and highly nonlinear dynamical system, it is natural to suppose that dynamical attractors may carry perceptual and functional meaning. Here we show that this idea, scarcely developed in current pitch models, can be successfully applied to pitch perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11320234      PMCID: PMC33127          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.081070998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  A spectral network model of pitch perception.

Authors:  M A Cohen; S Grossberg; L L Wyse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Subharmonic pitches of a pure tone at low S/N ratio.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch of iterated rippled noise.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral regularity as a factor distinct from harmonic relations in auditory grouping.

Authors:  B Roberts; P J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Pitch vs. spectral encoding of harmonic complex tones in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey.

Authors:  Y I Fishman; D H Reser; J C Arezzo; M Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-03-09       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Pitch, periodicity, and auditory organization.

Authors:  W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Residue pitch as a function of component spacing.

Authors:  R D Patterson; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effects of relative phase and the number of components on residue pitch.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Hoke; B Lütkenhöner; K Lehnertz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Evidence for a general template in central optimal processing for pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  A Gerson; J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perception of musical consonance and dissonance: an outcome of neural synchronization.

Authors:  Inbal Shapira Lots; Lewi Stone
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  High-intensity focused ultrasound surgery of the brain: part 1--A historical perspective with modern applications.

Authors:  Jay Jagannathan; Narendra T Sanghvi; Lawrence A Crum; Chun-Po Yen; Ricky Medel; Aaron S Dumont; Jason P Sheehan; Ladislau Steiner; Ferenc Jolesz; Neal F Kassell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Coding conspecific identity and motion in the electric sense.

Authors:  Na Yu; Ginette Hupé; Charles Garfinkle; John E Lewis; André Longtin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Computational Approach to Musical Consonance and Dissonance.

Authors:  Lluis L Trulla; Nicola Di Stefano; Alessandro Giuliani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-04

5.  Signal Processing in Periodically Forced Gradient Frequency Neural Networks.

Authors:  Ji Chul Kim; Edward W Large
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.