Literature DB >> 11319742

The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements.

S Sathasivam1, P S Walker, P A Campbell, K Rayner.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the wear rates in knee replacements are reduced as the contact area is increased. Hence, fixed bearing or mobile bearing designs with large contact areas throughout the full range of flexion wear less than partially conforming fixed-bearing designs. This hypothesis was investigated in an experimental model, where flat-ended ultra high molecular weight polyethylene pins of varying diameters were reciprocated and rotated on polished metal plates under a constant load with serum lubrication. The pin diameters ranged from 8-23 mm, giving nominal contact pressures from 23.9-2.8 MPa, covering the range associated with a wide spectrum of total knees including mobile-bearings. For pin diameters of 8-12 mm, the mean wear rates were in the range of 5.0-16.0 E-10 g/cycle. For diameters of 17 and 23 mm, the mean wear rates were approximately 1.0 E-10 g/cycle. The latter wear rates were significantly less than the former. Scanning electron microscopy indicated milder wear processes with the larger diameters, while the smaller diameters exhibited transverse ripples and cracks and detachment of thin layers from the surface. The percentages of granules (mostly submicron), fibrils and flakes, and the sizes of these particle types were similar among all pin diameters, except that, for the 23 mm pin diameter, the percentage of fibrils increased and of flakes decreased. This work supports the hypothesis that larger contact areas, up to the maximum area tested in our study, produce lower wear rates, and suggests that there is no disadvantage regarding particle type or size associated with the larger areas of contact. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11319742     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:3<282::aid-jbm1018>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  9 in total

1.  The self-aligning knee prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcome and survival analysis of a cruciate retaining meniscal bearing knee at 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  R A van Stralen; P G Anderson; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  No difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in activities of daily living and pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joicemar Tarouco Amaro; Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Diego Costa Astur; Pedro Debieux; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Moises Cohen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Advances in tribological testing of artificial joint biomaterials using multidirectional pin-on-disk testers.

Authors:  D Baykal; R S Siskey; H Haider; V Saikko; T Ahlroos; S M Kurtz
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-05-29

Review 5.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Daoyun Chen; Chen Zhu; Xiaoyun Pan; Xin Mao; Yongyuan Guo; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiung Huang; Jiann-Jong Liau; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Wear testing of moderate activities of daily living using in vivo measured knee joint loading.

Authors:  Jörn Reinders; Robert Sonntag; Leo Vot; Christian Gibney; Moritz Nowack; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Kinematics and Contact Mechanics in Normal Knee and Total Knee Replacements: A Computational Investigation.

Authors:  Liming Shu; Takashi Sato; Xijin Hua; Naohiko Sugita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  The biomechanical effect of different posterior tibial slopes on the tibiofemoral joint after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yingpeng Wang; Songhua Yan; Jizhou Zeng; Kuan Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.