Literature DB >> 11319075

Characterization of non-starter lactic acid bacteria from Italian ewe cheeses based on phenotypic, genotypic, and cell wall protein analyses.

M De Angelis1, A Corsetti, N Tosti, J Rossi, M R Corbo, M Gobbetti.   

Abstract

Non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) were isolated from 12 Italian ewe cheeses representing six different types of cheese, which in several cases were produced by different manufacturers. A total of 400 presumptive Lactobacillus isolates were obtained, and 123 isolates and 10 type strains were subjected to phenotypic, genetic, and cell wall protein characterization analyses. Phenotypically, the cheese isolates included 32% Lactobacillus plantarum isolates, 15% L. brevis isolates, 12% L. paracasei subsp. paracasei isolates, 9% L. curvatus isolates, 6% L. fermentum isolates, 6% L. casei subsp. casei isolates, 5% L. pentosus isolates, 3% L. casei subsp. pseudoplantarum isolates, and 1% L. rhamnosus isolates. Eleven percent of the isolates were not phenotypically identified. Although a randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis based on three primers and clustering by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) was useful for partially differentiating the 10 type strains, it did not provide a species-specific DNA band or a combination of bands which permitted complete separation of all the species considered. In contrast, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis cell wall protein profiles clustered by UPGMA were species specific and resolved the NSLAB. The only exceptions were isolates phenotypically identified as L. plantarum and L. pentosus or as L. casei subsp. casei and L. paracasei subsp. paracasei, which were grouped together. Based on protein profiles, Italian ewe cheeses frequently contained four different species and 3 to 16 strains. In general, the cheeses produced from raw ewe milk contained a larger number of more diverse strains than the cheeses produced from pasteurized milk. The same cheese produced in different factories contained different species, as well as strains that belonged to the same species but grouped in different RAPD clusters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11319075      PMCID: PMC92830          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2011-2020.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Genetic diversity among dairy lactococcal strains investigated by polymerase chain reaction with three arbitrary primers.

Authors:  I Mangin; D Corroler; A Reinhardt; M Gueguen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Optimization of the PCR program for RAPD analysis.

Authors:  K Yu; K P Pauls
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Interlaboratory comparative study of the numerical analysis of one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic protein patterns of Campylobacter strains.

Authors:  M Costas; B Pot; P Vandamme; K Kersters; R J Owen; L R Hill
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  A Lactobacillus helveticus-Specific DNA Probe Detects Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms in This Species.

Authors:  C G de Los Reyes-Gavilán; G K Limsowtin; P Tailliez; L Séchaud; J P Accolas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Increased sensitivity for Coomassie staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels using PhastSystem Development Unit.

Authors:  J Heukeshoven; R Dernick
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for rapid typing of Lactobacillus plantarum strains.

Authors:  M L Johansson; M Quednau; G Molin; S Ahrné
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  The presence of two S-layer-protein-encoding genes is conserved among species related to Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Authors:  H J Boot; C P Kolen; B Pot; K Kersters; P H Pouwels
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Characterization of bifidobacteria by random DNA amplification.

Authors:  D Vincent; D Roy; F Mondou; C Déry
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Molecular diversity and relationship within Lactococcus lactis, as revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD).

Authors:  P Tailliez; J Tremblay; S D Ehrlich; A Chopin
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Analysis of S-layer proteins of Lactobacillus brevis.

Authors:  T Yasui; K Yoda; T Kamiya
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  23 in total

1.  Screening, Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Properties Among Lactic Acid Bacteria Through Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Sundru Manjulata Devi; Ann Catherine Archer; Prakash M Halami
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Lactic Acid Bacteria in Durum Wheat Flour Are Endophytic Components of the Plant during Its Entire Life Cycle.

Authors:  Fabio Minervini; Giuseppe Celano; Anna Lattanzi; Luigi Tedone; Giuseppe De Mastro; Marco Gobbetti; Maria De Angelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Proteolysis by sourdough lactic acid bacteria: effects on wheat flour protein fractions and gliadin peptides involved in human cereal intolerance.

Authors:  Raffaella Di Cagno; Maria De Angelis; Paola Lavermicocca; Massimo De Vincenzi; Claudio Giovannini; Michele Faccia; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Annotated genome sequence of Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10, which has probiotic potential, from naturally fermented Aloreña green table olives.

Authors:  Hikmate Abriouel; Nabil Benomar; Rubén Pérez Pulido; Magdalena Martínez Cañamero; Antonio Gálvez
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Study of adhesion and survival of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria on table olives with the aim of formulating a new probiotic food.

Authors:  Paola Lavermicocca; Francesca Valerio; Stella Lisa Lonigro; Maria De Angelis; Lorenzo Morelli; Maria Luisa Callegari; Carlo G Rizzello; Angelo Visconti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Phenotypic and genotypic identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional pickles of the Çubuk region in Turkey.

Authors:  Simel Bağder Elmacı; Mehmet Tokatlı; Derya Dursun; Filiz Özçelik; Pınar Şanlıbaba
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  Lactic acid bacterium and yeast microbiotas of 19 sourdoughs used for traditional/typical italian breads: interactions between ingredients and microbial species diversity.

Authors:  Fabio Minervini; Raffaella Di Cagno; Anna Lattanzi; Maria De Angelis; Livio Antonielli; Gianluigi Cardinali; Stefan Cappelle; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Randomly-amplified microsatellite polymorphism for preliminary typing of lactic acid bacteria from Bryndza Cheese.

Authors:  V Chebeňová; G Berta; T Kuchta; B Brežná; D Pangallo
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Preliminary evaluation of probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Italian food products.

Authors:  Barbara Turchi; Simone Mancini; Filippo Fratini; Francesca Pedonese; Roberta Nuvoloni; Fabrizio Bertelloni; Valentina Virginia Ebani; Domenico Cerri
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses.

Authors:  S Siragusa; M De Angelis; R Di Cagno; C G Rizzello; R Coda; M Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.