Literature DB >> 11206215

A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: a note on the counter model.

E J Wagenmakers1, R Zeelenberg, L J Schooler, J G Raaijmakers.   

Abstract

The original version of the counter model for perceptual identification (Ratcliff & McKoon, 1997) assumed that word frequency and prior study act solely to bias the identification process (i.e., subjects have a tendency to prefer high-frequency and studied low-frequency words, irrespective of the presented word). In a recent study, using a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, we showed an enhanced discriminability effect for high-frequency and studied low-frequency words (Wagenmakers, Zeelenberg, & Raaijmakers, 2000). These results have led to a fundamental modification of the counter model: Prior study and high frequency not only result in bias, but presumably also result in a higher rate of feature extraction (i.e., better perception). We demonstrate that a criterion-shift model, assuming limited perceptual information extracted from the flash as well as a reduced distance to an identification threshold for high-frequency and studied low-frequency words, can also account for enhanced discriminability.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11206215     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Modeling the effects of repetition and word frequency in perceptual identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.

Authors:  L J Schooler; R M Shiffrin; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Semantic and perceptual priming: how similar are the underlying mechanisms?

Authors:  M J Farah
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of semantic priming on visual encoding of pictures.

Authors:  M T Reinitz; E Wright; G R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-09

6.  A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon; M Verwoerd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Bias in auditory priming.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; D Allbritton; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  W K Estes; J L Brunn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

9.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Irwin; A M Osman; J Kounios
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Bias in the priming of object decisions.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Performance benefits and costs in forced choice perceptual identification in amnesia: Effects of prior exposure and word frequency.

Authors:  Margaret M Keane; Elizabeth Martin; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.