OBJECTIVES: To investigate the knowledge of, and perceptions, attitudes and exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) of staff in the New Zealand hospitality industry. METHOD: Face-to-face interviews with bar staff, waiters, and bar and eating-place managers and owners in Wellington during the 1999-2000 summer. An analysis was made of the 1999 New Zealand Electoral Roll to find the number of those most exposed to SHS. RESULTS: 435 interviews with full data recovery were completed at 364 locations; 59% of interviewees were exposed to SHS, including 77% of those at licensed premises. More than half of those exposed to workplace smoke reported irritation from SHS to their throat or lungs. Less than a third were aware of the risk of strokes from SHS. Three-quarters of interviewees wanted some sort of smoking restriction in bars. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of interviewees were at risk of premature death and disease because of exposure to workplace smoke, and had an incomplete knowledge of the dangers to which they were exposed. More than 5,000 similar workers in New Zealand appear to share this risk. IMPLICATIONS: This industry needs legislation to make it smoke free.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the knowledge of, and perceptions, attitudes and exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) of staff in the New Zealand hospitality industry. METHOD: Face-to-face interviews with bar staff, waiters, and bar and eating-place managers and owners in Wellington during the 1999-2000 summer. An analysis was made of the 1999 New Zealand Electoral Roll to find the number of those most exposed to SHS. RESULTS: 435 interviews with full data recovery were completed at 364 locations; 59% of interviewees were exposed to SHS, including 77% of those at licensed premises. More than half of those exposed to workplace smoke reported irritation from SHS to their throat or lungs. Less than a third were aware of the risk of strokes from SHS. Three-quarters of interviewees wanted some sort of smoking restriction in bars. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of interviewees were at risk of premature death and disease because of exposure to workplace smoke, and had an incomplete knowledge of the dangers to which they were exposed. More than 5,000 similar workers in New Zealand appear to share this risk. IMPLICATIONS: This industry needs legislation to make it smoke free.
Authors: Miranda R Jones; Heather Wipfli; Shahida Shahrir; Erika Avila-Tang; Jonathan M Samet; Patrick N Breysse; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Tob Control Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Bernie J Mullally; Birgit A Greiner; Shane Allwright; Gillian Paul; Ivan J Perry Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Vickie L Shavers; Pebbles Fagan; Linda A Jouridine Alexander; Richard Clayton; Jennifer Doucet; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.710