BACKGROUND: In the absence of comprehensive smoking bans in public places, bars and nightclubs have the highest concentrations of secondhand tobacco smoke, posing a serious health risk for workers in these venues. OBJECTIVE: To assess exposure of bar and nightclub employees to secondhand smoke, including non-smoking and smoking employees. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, the authors recruited approximately 10 venues per city and up to five employees per venue in 24 cities in the Americas, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Air nicotine concentrations were measured for 7 days in 238 venues. To evaluate personal exposure to secondhand smoke, hair nicotine concentrations were also measured for 625 non-smoking and 311 smoking employees (N=936). RESULTS: Median (IQR) air nicotine concentrations were 3.5 (1.5-8.5) μg/m(3) and 0.2 (0.1-0.7) μg/m(3) in smoking and smoke-free venues, respectively. Median (IQR) hair nicotine concentrations were 6.0 (1.6-16.0) ng/mg and 1.7 (0.5-5.5) ng/mg in smoking and non-smoking employees, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, education, living with a smoker, hair treatment and region, a twofold increase in air nicotine concentrations was associated with a 30% (95% CI 23% to 38%) increase in hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees and with a 10% (2% to 19%) increase in smoking employees. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke, assessed by air nicotine, resulted in elevated concentrations of hair nicotine among non-smoking and smoking bar and nightclub employees. The high levels of airborne nicotine found in bars and nightclubs and the contribution of this exposure to employee hair nicotine concentrations support the need for legislation measures that ensure complete protection from secondhand smoke in these venues.
BACKGROUND: In the absence of comprehensive smoking bans in public places, bars and nightclubs have the highest concentrations of secondhand tobacco smoke, posing a serious health risk for workers in these venues. OBJECTIVE: To assess exposure of bar and nightclub employees to secondhand smoke, including non-smoking and smoking employees. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, the authors recruited approximately 10 venues per city and up to five employees per venue in 24 cities in the Americas, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Air nicotine concentrations were measured for 7 days in 238 venues. To evaluate personal exposure to secondhand smoke, hair nicotine concentrations were also measured for 625 non-smoking and 311 smoking employees (N=936). RESULTS: Median (IQR) air nicotine concentrations were 3.5 (1.5-8.5) μg/m(3) and 0.2 (0.1-0.7) μg/m(3) in smoking and smoke-free venues, respectively. Median (IQR) hair nicotine concentrations were 6.0 (1.6-16.0) ng/mg and 1.7 (0.5-5.5) ng/mg in smoking and non-smoking employees, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, education, living with a smoker, hair treatment and region, a twofold increase in air nicotine concentrations was associated with a 30% (95% CI 23% to 38%) increase in hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees and with a 10% (2% to 19%) increase in smoking employees. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke, assessed by air nicotine, resulted in elevated concentrations of hair nicotine among non-smoking and smoking bar and nightclub employees. The high levels of airborne nicotine found in bars and nightclubs and the contribution of this exposure to employee hair nicotine concentrations support the need for legislation measures that ensure complete protection from secondhand smoke in these venues.
Entities:
Keywords:
Nicotine; cotinine; environmental tobacco smoke; global health; harm reduction; human rights; litigation; low/middle-income country; national capacity building; prevalence; secondhand smoke; smoking-caused disease; surveillance and monitoring; tobacco smoke pollution; workplace
Authors: Joni A Jensen; Barbara A Schillo; Molly M Moilanen; Bruce R Lindgren; Sharon Murphy; Steven Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Esteve Fernández; Marcela Fu; Mónica Pérez-Ríos; María J López; Carles Ariza; José A Pascual; Anna Schiaffino; Raúl Pérez-Ortuño; Esteve Saltó; Manel Nebot Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Judith A Groner; Hong Huang; Nicholas Eastman; Luke Lewis; Mandar S Joshi; Brandon L Schanbacher; Lisa Nicholson; John A Bauer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Katherine A Moon; Hoda Magid; Christine Torrey; Ana M Rule; Jacqueline Ferguson; Jolie Susan; Zhuolu Sun; Salahaddin Abubaker; Vladimir Levshin; Aslı Çarkoğlu; Ghada Nasr Radwan; Maha El-Rabbat; Joanna Cohen; Paul Strickland; Ana Navas-Acien; Patrick N Breysse Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Nur Nadia Mohamed; See Ling Loy; Che Nin Man; Abdullah Al-Mamun; Hamid Jan Jan Mohamed Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Katherine A Moon; Ana M Rule; Hoda S Magid; Jacqueline M Ferguson; Jolie Susan; Zhuolu Sun; Christine Torrey; Salahaddin Abubaker; Vladimir Levshin; Asli Çarkoglu; Ghada Nasr Radwan; Maha El-Rabbat; Joanna E Cohen; Paul Strickland; Patrick N Breysse; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Bekir Kaplan; Thomas Sussan; Ana Rule; Katherine Moon; Maria Grau-Perez; Pablo Olmedo; Rui Chen; Asli Carkoglu; Vladimir Levshin; Lanqing Wang; Clifford Watson; Benjamin Blount; Antonia M Calafat; Jeffery Jarrett; Kathleen Caldwell; Yuesong Wang; Pattrick Breysse; Paul Strickland; Joanna Cohen; Shyam Biswal; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Esther García-Esquinas; Angélica Jiménez; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Miranda R Jones; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Ana Navas-Acien; Maria Tellez-Plaza Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 9.621