BACKGROUND: On 29 March 2004, the Republic of Ireland (ROI) became the first EU country to introduce a nationwide ban on workplace smoking. While the focus of this measure was to protect worker health by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, other effects such as a greater reduction in smoking prevalence and consumption were likely among bar workers. METHODS: A random sample of bar workers from Cork city were surveyed before (n = 129) and after (n = 107; 82.9% follow-up rate) implementation of the smoke-free legislation. Self report and combined self report and cotinine concentration were used to determine smoking status. For comparison a cross-sectional random telephone survey of the general population (ROI) was conducted before and 1 year after the smoke-free legislation. There were 1240 pre- and 1221 participants post-ban in the equivalent age and occupational subset of the general population. RESULTS: There was a non-significant decline in smoking prevalence among bar workers 1 year post-ban (self report: -2.8% from 51.4% to 48.6%, P = 0.51; combined self report and cotinine: -4.7% from 56.1% to 51.4%, P = 0.13), but a significant decline in consumption of four cigarettes (95% CI 2.21-6.36) per day. Within the occupationally equivalent general population sub-sample there was a significant drop (3.5%, P = 0.06) in smoking prevalence but no significant change in consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Ireland's smoke-free workplace legislation was accompanied by a drop in smoking prevalence in both bar workers and the general population sub-sample.
BACKGROUND: On 29 March 2004, the Republic of Ireland (ROI) became the first EU country to introduce a nationwide ban on workplace smoking. While the focus of this measure was to protect worker health by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, other effects such as a greater reduction in smoking prevalence and consumption were likely among bar workers. METHODS: A random sample of bar workers from Cork city were surveyed before (n = 129) and after (n = 107; 82.9% follow-up rate) implementation of the smoke-free legislation. Self report and combined self report and cotinine concentration were used to determine smoking status. For comparison a cross-sectional random telephone survey of the general population (ROI) was conducted before and 1 year after the smoke-free legislation. There were 1240 pre- and 1221 participants post-ban in the equivalent age and occupational subset of the general population. RESULTS: There was a non-significant decline in smoking prevalence among bar workers 1 year post-ban (self report: -2.8% from 51.4% to 48.6%, P = 0.51; combined self report and cotinine: -4.7% from 56.1% to 51.4%, P = 0.13), but a significant decline in consumption of four cigarettes (95% CI 2.21-6.36) per day. Within the occupationally equivalent general population sub-sample there was a significant drop (3.5%, P = 0.06) in smoking prevalence but no significant change in consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Ireland's smoke-free workplace legislation was accompanied by a drop in smoking prevalence in both bar workers and the general population sub-sample.
Authors: Debora L Oh; Julia E Heck; Carolyn Dresler; Shane Allwright; Margaretha Haglund; Sara S Del Mazo; Eva Kralikova; Isabelle Stucker; Elizabeth Tamang; Ellen R Gritz; Mia Hashibe Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: J E Heck; I Stücker; S Allwright; E R Gritz; M Haglund; C G Healton; E Kralikova; S Sanchez Del Mazo; E Tamang; C M Dresler; M Hashibe Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Kate Frazer; Joanne E Callinan; Jack McHugh; Susan van Baarsel; Anna Clarke; Kirsten Doherty; Cecily Kelleher Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-04
Authors: Lisa M Wilson; Erika Avila Tang; Geetanjali Chander; Heidi E Hutton; Olaide A Odelola; Jessica L Elf; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Eric B Bass; Emily A Little; Elisabeth B Haberl; Benjamin J Apelberg Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2012-06-07
Authors: Elisabeth A Donaldson; Hugh R Waters; Monika Arora; Beena Varghese; Paresh Dave; Bhavesh Modi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephanie L Mayne; Amy H Auchincloss; Loni Philip Tabb; Mark Stehr; James M Shikany; Pamela J Schreiner; Rachel Widome; Penny Gordon-Larsen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.363