Literature DB >> 11296864

Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance.

A J Moore1, P A Gowaty, W G Wallin, P J Moore.   

Abstract

Conflicts between the sexes over control of reproduction are thought to lead to a cost of sexual selection through the evolution of male traits that manipulate female reproductive physiology and behaviour, and female traits that resist this manipulation. Although studies have begun to document negative fitness effects of sexual conflict, studies showing the expected association between sexual conflict and the specific behavioural mechanisms of sexual selection are lacking. Here we experimentally manipulated the opportunity for sexual conflict in the cockroach. Nauphoeta cinerea and showed that, for this species, odour cues in the social environment influence the behavioural strategies and fitness of males and females during sexual selection. Females provided with the opportunity for discriminating between males but not necessarily mating with preferred males produced fewer male offspring than females mated at random. The number of female offspring produced was not affected, nor was the viability of the offspring. Experimental modification of the composition of the males' pheromone showed that the fecundity effects were caused by exposure to the pheromone component that makes males attractive to females but also makes males less likely to be dominant. Female mate choice therefore carries a demographic cost but functions to avoid male manipulation and aggression. Male-male competition appears to function to circumvent mate choice rather than directly manipulating females, as the mate choice can be cryptic. The dynamic struggle between the sexes for control of mating opportunities and outcomes in N. cinerea therefore reveals a unique role for sexual conflict in the evolution of the behavioural components of sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11296864      PMCID: PMC1088635          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  6 in total

1.  Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load.

Authors:  B Holland; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hypersexual Activity Induced in Females of the Cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea.

Authors:  L M Roth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Anandamide may mediate sleep induction.

Authors:  R Mechoulam; E Fride; L Hanus; T Sheskin; T Bisogno; V Di Marzo; M Bayewitch; Z Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products.

Authors:  T Chapman; L F Liddle; J M Kalb; M F Wolfner; L Partridge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard.

Authors:  E J Cunningham; A F Russell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total
  31 in total

1.  Do pheromones reveal male immunocompetence?

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Ilmari Jokinen; Raine Kortet; Anssi Vainikka; Jukka Suhonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Stephen P Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Wyatt W Anderson; Cynthia K Bluhm; Lee C Drickamer; Yong-Kyu Kim; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Loser-effect duration evolves independently of fighting ability.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Yasukazu Okada; Sasha R X Dall; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Masako Katsuki; Manmohan D Sharma; Clarissa M House; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Individual Pheromone Signature in Males: Prerequisite for Pheromone-Mediated Mate Assessment in the Central American Locust, Schistocerca Piceifrons.

Authors:  Christiane Stahr; Karsten Seidelmann
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  The survival advantage of olfaction in a competitive environment.

Authors:  Kenta Asahina; Viktoryia Pavlenkovich; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  To signal or not to signal? Chemical communication by urine-borne signals mirrors sexual conflict in crayfish.

Authors:  Fiona C Berry; Thomas Breithaupt
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.