Literature DB >> 10716444

Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard.

E J Cunningham1, A F Russell.   

Abstract

Why females prefer to copulate with particular males is a contentious issue. Attention is currently focused on whether females choose males on the basis of their genetic quality, in order to produce more viable offspring. Support for this hypothesis in birds has come from studies showing that preferred males tend to father offspring of better condition or with increased survivorship. Before attributing greater offspring viability to a male's heritable genetic quality, however, it is important to discount effects arising from confounding sources, including maternal effects. This has generally been addressed by comparing offspring viability from two different breeding attempts by the same female: one when offspring are sired by a preferred male, and one when offspring are sired by a less preferred male. However, here we show that individual female mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) lay larger eggs after copulating with preferred males and smaller eggs after copulating with less preferred males. As a result, females produced offspring of better body condition when paired with preferred males. After controlling for these differences in maternal investment, we found no effect of paternity on offspring condition. This shows that differences between half-sibs cannot always be attributed to paternal or maternal genetic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10716444     DOI: 10.1038/35003565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  66 in total

1.  Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish.

Authors:  N Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Uncoupling direct and indirect components of female choice in the wild.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect.

Authors:  N Wedell; B Karlsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Unpredictable food supply modifies costs of reproduction and hampers individual optimization.

Authors:  János Török; Gergely Hegyi; László Tóth; Réka Könczey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Jennifer L Kelley; Angelo Bisazza; Elisabetta Finazzo; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Watching sexy displays improves hatching success and offspring growth through maternal allocation.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Frédéric Lacroix
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Bargaining babblers: vocal negotiation of cooperative behaviour in a social bird.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R A Smith; A M Thompson; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Kin recognition and adjustment of reproductive effort in zebra finches.

Authors:  Aneta Arct; Joanna Rutkowska; Rafal Martyka; Szymon M Drobniak; Mariusz Cichon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  When mothers make sons sexy: maternal effects contribute to the increased sexual attractiveness of extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Barbara Tschirren; Erik Postma; Alison N Rutstein; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Poor maternal environment enhances offspring disease resistance in an invertebrate.

Authors:  Suzanne E Mitchell; Andrew F Read
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.