Literature DB >> 11294447

Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?

S Andrews1, A Heathcote.   

Abstract

The same 500 words were presented in 6 different word identification tasks (Experiment 1: lexical decision, semantic categorization, and 3 speeded naming tasks; Experiment 2: delayed naming). Reaction time (RT) distributions were estimated for each task and analyses tested for the effects of word frequency and animacy on various parameters of the RT distribution. Low frequency words yielded more skewed distributions than high frequency words in all tasks except delayed naming. The differential skew was most marked for tasks that required lexical discrimination. The semantic categorization task yielded highly skewed distributions for all words, but the word frequency effect was due to shifts in the location of the RT distributions rather than changes in skew. The results are used to evaluate the relative contributions of a common lexical access process and task-specific processes to performance in lexical discrimination and naming tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294447     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  34 in total

1.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Pablo Gomez; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Scott Brown; D J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.

Authors:  Paul D Siakaluk; Lori Buchanan; Chris Westbury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

4.  An evaluation of the Vincentizing method of forming group-level response time distributions.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Paul L Speckman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

5.  Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks.

Authors:  Chi-Shing Tse; David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Janet M Duchek; David P McCabe
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Jun Lu; Paul Speckman; Dongchu Sun; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

7.  Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.

Authors:  Lucia Colombo; Margherita Pasini; David A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

8.  How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Michael C Mozer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

9.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  RT distribution analysis of category congruence effects with masked primes.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Louise Hunt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.