Literature DB >> 11294442

Generation and hypermnesia.

N W Mulligan1.   

Abstract

The multifactor account of the generation effect makes detailed predictions about the effects of generation on item-specific and relational encoding, predictions confirmed in four experiments using a multiple-test methodology. In pure-list designs with unrelated study items, generation produced more interest item gains (indexing greater item-specific processing) and more interest item losses (indexing less relational processing) relative to the read condition. In a mixed-list design, generation produced more gains but did not affect losses. With categorically-related study items, generation produced more gains but fewer losses (indicating enhanced relational encoding). Generation consistently produced hypermnesia whereas reading did so only for related study items. Also, a significant generation effect emerged on later tests under conditions (between-subjects design, unrelated study items) which typically yield no generation effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294442     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  21 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Kerstin H Seiler; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-23

3.  Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Marquinn D Duke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

4.  The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

5.  Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-28

6.  The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.

Authors:  Adam Congleton; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

7.  Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Lauren M Knott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

8.  The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.

Authors:  Franklin M Zaromb; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

9.  Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Kerstin H Seiler; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

10.  Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Melissa J Guynn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.