R Gradaus1, D Hammel, S Kotthoff, D Böcker. 1. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany. gradaus@uni-muenster.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The need to access the right ventricle might preclude transvenous placement of a defibrillation lead at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement, especially in small children or children with complex congenital heart defects. We investigated a subcutaneous array lead in addition to an abdominally placed "active can" ICD device in two children to avoid a thoracotomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: The first child (age 12 years, 138 cm, 41 kg) had transposition of the great arteries with a subsequent surgical intra-atrial correction by the Mustard technique. The second child (age 14 years, 161 cm, 54 kg) had a single atrium and a single ventricle, d-transposition of the aorta, and atresia of the main pulmonary artery with a surgical anastomosis between the aorta and the right pulmonary artery by the Cooley technique. The defibrillation threshold was 18 J and <20 J at initial implantation and at generator replacement in the first patient and 20 J in the second patient. During follow-up of 6 years and 1 month, respectively, no ICD-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: In children in whom endocardial, right ventricular placement of a defibrillation lead is precluded, defibrillation is possible and safe between an abdominally placed "active can" ICD device and a subcutaneous array lead. This approach may avoid a thoracotomy in children with no possibility for transvenous ICD placement.
INTRODUCTION: The need to access the right ventricle might preclude transvenous placement of a defibrillation lead at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement, especially in small children or children with complex congenital heart defects. We investigated a subcutaneous array lead in addition to an abdominally placed "active can" ICD device in two children to avoid a thoracotomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: The first child (age 12 years, 138 cm, 41 kg) had transposition of the great arteries with a subsequent surgical intra-atrial correction by the Mustard technique. The second child (age 14 years, 161 cm, 54 kg) had a single atrium and a single ventricle, d-transposition of the aorta, and atresia of the main pulmonary artery with a surgical anastomosis between the aorta and the right pulmonary artery by the Cooley technique. The defibrillation threshold was 18 J and <20 J at initial implantation and at generator replacement in the first patient and 20 J in the second patient. During follow-up of 6 years and 1 month, respectively, no ICD-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: In children in whom endocardial, right ventricular placement of a defibrillation lead is precluded, defibrillation is possible and safe between an abdominally placed "active can" ICD device and a subcutaneous array lead. This approach may avoid a thoracotomy in children with no possibility for transvenous ICD placement.
Authors: Riccardo Cappato; Warren M Smith; Margaret A Hood; Ian G Crozier; Luc Jordaens; Stefan G Spitzer; Andrey V Ardashev; Lucas Boersma; Pierpaolo Lupo; Andrew A Grace; Gust H Bardy Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: A Derk Jan Ten Harkel; Nico A Blom; Annette G Reimer; Raymond Tukkie; Narayanswami Sreeram; Margreet T E Bink-Boelkens Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Christopher B Stefanelli; David J Bradley; Sarah Leroy; Macdonald Dick; Gerald A Serwer; Peter S Fischbach Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 1.900