Literature DB >> 16142519

Transvenous ICD implantation after artificial tricuspid valve replacement. A new approach placing a transvenous ICD lead in the mid cardiac vein of the coronary sinus.

R Gradaus1, L Eckardt, H Wedekind, A Löher, D Böcker.   

Abstract

Implantation of a transvenous device in patients with a tricuspid valve replacement or a complex congenital heart disease with no access to the right ventricle represents problems. The lack of access to the right ventricle might preclude transvenous placement of a defibrillation lead at ICD implantation. A young patient (21 years) with a history of severe chest trauma with rupture of the tricuspid valve as well as the right coronary artery and consecutive inferior myocardial infarction was initially treated with tricuspid valve replacement (St Jude Medical artificial prosthesis, 33 mm) and a bypass graft to the right coronary artery. Four years later, the patient was admitted with a hemodynamically not tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT: CL 250 ms, LBBB, left axis). The VT could be reproduced during electrophysiological testing. An ICD was implanted subpectorally in combination with a transvenous active fixation ICD lead. The transvenous ICD lead was placed via a guiding catheter into a coronary sinus branch (middle cardiac vein). Acceptable pacing and sensing values could be obtained. The defibrillation threshold was 25 J. In conclusion transvenous ICD lead implantation into a side branch of the coronary sinus in combination with a pectorally implanted "active can" ICD device seems to be an alternative approach. This approach may avoid implantation of additional subcutaneous defibrillation leads or even thoracotomy for ICD implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16142519     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-005-0272-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  7 in total

1.  Modified implantation of a transvenous defibrillator in a patient after tricuspid valve replacement.

Authors:  C Schreiber; H Mehmanesch; C Kolb; C Schmitt; R Lange
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest : the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH).

Authors:  K H Kuck; R Cappato; J Siebels; R Rüppel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Lead configuration for defibrillator implantation in a patient with congenital heart disease and a mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valve.

Authors:  C T Leng; J E Crosson; H Calkins; R D Berger
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  [Transvenous-subcutaneous implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator after bioprosthetic replacement of a tricuspid valve].

Authors:  N Doll; I Dähnert; A Dorszewski; H Bernau; U Wetzel; P Schneider; J F Gummert; F W Mohr
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2003-06

5.  Nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement in children: use of subcutaneous array leads and abdominally placed implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children.

Authors:  R Gradaus; D Hammel; S Kotthoff; D Böcker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03

6.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone.

Authors:  S J Connolly; M Gent; R S Roberts; P Dorian; D Roy; R S Sheldon; L B Mitchell; M S Green; G J Klein; B O'Brien
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.