Literature DB >> 11286594

Whose interests do lay people represent? Towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees.

C Hogg1, C Williamson.   

Abstract

Increasingly, lay people are appointed as members to health service committees. The term 'lay' is used loosely and the reasons for involving lay people are seldom clearly defined. This paper argues that the different roles that lay people play need to be explicitly defined in order for their contributions to be realized. Although lay members of health service committees are generally assumed to be working for patients' interests, our observations lead us to think that some lay people tend to support professionals' or managers' interests rather than patients' interests as patients would define them. We suggest that lay people fall into three broad categories: supporters of dominant (professional) interests, supporters of challenging (managerial) interests and supporters of repressed (patient) interests. These alignments should be taken into account in appointments to health service bodies. Further research is needed on the alignments and roles of lay members.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11286594      PMCID: PMC5060049          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00106.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  5 in total

1.  The challenge of lay partnership. It provides a different view of the world.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Consulting consumers. A manager's guide to consumers.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1995-11-30

Review 3.  The rise of doctor-patient working groups.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-14

Review 4.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  C Charles; S DeMaio
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

5.  Reflections on health care consumerism: insights from feminism.

Authors:  Charlotte Williamson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.377

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Alford's theoretical political framework and its application to interests in health care now.

Authors:  Charlotte Williamson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.

Authors:  Sally Nathan; Lynda Johnston; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Combining professional and lay knowledge to improve patient care.

Authors:  Charlotte Williamson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Patient organizations in Finland: increasing numbers and great variation.

Authors:  Hanna K Toiviainen; Lauri H Vuorenkoski; Elina K Hemminki
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.

Authors:  Sara K Tedford Gold; Julia Abelson; Cathy A Charles
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.

Authors:  Devidas Menon; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  User involvement in clinical governance.

Authors:  Susan Pickard; Martin Marshall; Anne Rogers; Rod Sheaff; Bonnie Sibbald; Stephen Campbell; Shirley Halliwell; Martin Roland
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Group affiliation in self-management: support or threat to identity?

Authors:  Dagmara Bossy; Ingrid Ruud Knutsen; Anne Rogers; Christina Foss
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Addressing men's health policy concerns in Australia: what can be done?

Authors:  James A Smith
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-10-10

10.  Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.

Authors:  Edel Tierney; Rachel McEvoy; Ailish Hannigan; Anne E MacFarlane
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.