Literature DB >> 16098150

From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.

Sara K Tedford Gold1, Julia Abelson, Cathy A Charles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent and manner of patient participation in the planning of regional supportive care networks throughout the province of Ontario. We consider the disconnect between the rhetoric and reality of patient involvement in network planning and co-ordination. CONTEXT: In 1997, the Province of Ontario, Canada, established a new, regionalized cancer care system. By transferring responsibility to the regional level and to networks, the architects of the new provincial system hoped to broaden participation in decision making and to enhance the responsiveness of decisions to communities. RESEARCH APPROACH: Through a qualitative, multiple case study approach we evaluated the processes of involving patients in network development. In-depth, semi-structured interviews and document analysis were complemented by observations of provincial meetings, regional council and network meetings.
RESULTS: The network development processes in the three case study regions reveal a significant gap between intentions to involve patients in health planning and their actual involvement. This gap can be explained by: (i) a lack of clear direction regarding networks and patient participation in these networks; (ii) the dominance of regional cancer centres in network planning activities; and, (iii) the emergence of competing provincial priorities. DISCUSSION: These three trends expose the complexity of the notion of public participation and how it is embedded in social and political contexts. The failed attempt at involving patients in health planning efforts is the result of benign neglect of public participation intents and the social and political contexts in which public and patient participation is meant to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098150      PMCID: PMC5060302          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00334.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  21 in total

1.  Pluralism, public choice, and the state in the emerging paradigm in health systems.

Authors:  Dov Chernichovsky
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  A sociological perspective on public participation in health care.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Correlates of consumer participation in health planning agencies: findings and implications from a national survey.

Authors:  B Checkoway; T W O'Rourke; D Bull
Journal:  Policy Stud Rev       Date:  1984

4.  Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making.

Authors:  Julia Abelson; Pierre-Gerlier Forest; Ann Casebeer; Gail Mackean
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2004-10

5.  Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public.

Authors:  J Jordan; T Dowswell; S Harrison; R J Lilford; M Mort
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-30

Review 6.  Health policy planning: a look at consumer involvement in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  M J Sullivan; Y Scattolon
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  C Charles; S DeMaio
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  Is consumer control possible in health care services? The Quebec case.

Authors:  J Godbout
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.663

9.  What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public.

Authors:  T Webler; S Tuler; R Krueger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 10.  Involving patients and the public in the NHS.

Authors:  Christopher Clough
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.659

View more
  8 in total

1.  Are elected health boards an effective mechanism for public participation in health service governance?

Authors:  Robin Gauld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Does implementing a development plan for user participation in a mental hospital change patients' experience? A non-randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marit B Rise; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Aiming for inclusion: a case study of motivations for involvement in mental health-care governance by ethnic minority users.

Authors:  Cláudia de Freitas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.

Authors:  Phil Cotterell; Gwen Harlow; Carolyn Morris; Peter Beresford; Bec Hanley; Anita Sargeant; John Sitzia; Kristina Staley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patient engagement in the process of planning and designing outpatient care improvements at the Veterans Administration Health-care System: findings from an online expert panel.

Authors:  Dmitry Khodyakov; Susan E Stockdale; Nina Smith; Marika Booth; Lisa Altman; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Heather McNeil; Jacobi Elliott; Kelsey Huson; Jessica Ashbourne; George Heckman; Jennifer Walker; Paul Stolee
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-03-07

7.  "Part of the Team": Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning.

Authors:  Svetlana Shklarov; Deborah A Marshall; Tracy Wasylak; Nancy J Marlett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  From awareness to involvement? A qualitative study of respiratory patients' awareness of health service change.

Authors:  Tara Kielmann; Guro Huby; Alison Powell; Aziz Sheikh; David Price; Sian Williams; Hilary Pinnock
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.