Literature DB >> 11284681

X-ray structure analyses of photosynthetic reaction center variants from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: structural changes induced by point mutations at position L209 modulate electron and proton transfer.

A Kuglstatter1, U Ermler, H Michel, L Baciou, G Fritzsch.   

Abstract

The structures of the reaction center variants Pro L209 --> Tyr, Pro L209 --> Phe, and Pro L209 --> Glu from the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides have been determined by X-ray crystallography to 2.6-2.8 A resolution. These variants were constructed to interrupt a chain of tightly bound water molecules that was assumed to facilitate proton transfer from the cytoplasm to the secondary quinone Q(B) [Baciou, L., and Michel, H. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 7967-7972]. However, the amino acid exchanges Pro L209 --> Tyr and Pro L209 --> Phe do not interrupt the water chain. Both aromatic side chains are oriented away from this water chain and interact with three surrounding polar side chains (Asp L213, Thr L226, and Glu H173) which are displaced by up to 2.6 A. The conformational changes induced by the bulky aromatic rings of Tyr L209 and Phe L209 lead to unexpected displacements of Q(B) compared to the wild-type protein. In the structure of the Pro L209 --> Tyr variant, Q(B) is shifted by approximately 4 A and is now located at a position similar to that reported for the wild-type reaction center after illumination [Stowell, M. H. B., et al. (1997) Science 276, 812-816]. In the Pro L209 --> Phe variant, the electron density map reveals an intermediate Q(B) position between the binding sites of the wild-type protein in the dark and the Pro L209 --> Tyr protein. In the Pro L209 --> Glu reaction center, the carboxylic side chain of Glu L209 is located within the water chain, and the binding site of Q(B) remains unchanged compared to the wild-type structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11284681     DOI: 10.1021/bi001589h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Key role of proline L209 in connecting the distant quinone pockets in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  J Tandori; P Maroti; E Alexov; P Sebban; L Baciou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The position of QB in the photosynthetic reaction center depends on pH: a theoretical analysis of the proton uptake upon QB reduction.

Authors:  Antoine Taly; Pierre Sebban; Jeremy C Smith; G Matthias Ullmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Residual water modulates QA- -to-QB electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers embedded in trehalose amorphous matrices.

Authors:  Francesco Francia; Gerardo Palazzo; Antonia Mallardi; Lorenzo Cordone; Giovanni Venturoli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Comparative analyses of three-dimensional models of bacterial reaction centers.

Authors:  A Camara-Artigas; J P Allen
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Trapped conformational states of semiquinone (D+*QB-*) formed by B-branch electron transfer at low temperature in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers.

Authors:  M L Paddock; M Flores; R Isaacson; C Chang; E C Abresch; P Selvaduray; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  ENDOR spectroscopy reveals light induced movement of the H-bond from Ser-L223 upon forming the semiquinone (Q(B)(-)(*)) in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  M L Paddock; M Flores; R Isaacson; C Chang; E C Abresch; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Incorporation of selenomethionine into induced intracytoplasmic membrane proteins of Rhodobacter species.

Authors:  Philip D Laible; Aaron N Hata; Adam E Crawford; Deborah K Hanson
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2005

Review 8.  The nonheme iron in photosystem II.

Authors:  Frank Müh; Athina Zouni
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Which side of the pi-macrocycle plane of (bacterio)chlorophylls is favored for binding of the fifth ligand?

Authors:  Toru Oba; Hitoshi Tamiaki
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.