Literature DB >> 11275351

Stress distribution changes in bovine vertebrae just below the endplate after sustained loading.

J H van Dieën1, I Kingma, R Meijer, L Hänsel, R Huiskes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pattern of stress distribution in the vertebral body just behind the endplate, and to document its changes due to sustained loading.
METHODS: Twelve fresh bovine coccygeal motion segments were dissected and tested. Each specimen was axially loaded with a sustained compressive force of 50% of its estimated compressive strength. Before loading, after 1.5 h and after 3 h of loading, the distribution of the axial pressure under the bottom vertebra (i.e., just below its top endplate) was recorded at three force levels (25%, 37.5% and 50% of the estimated compressive strength), using pressure-sensitive film.
RESULTS: Stress distribution over the endplate was found to be fairly uniform. At low compression forces, the stress was the highest centrally. With increased compression and after sustained compression the uniformity improved through a significant redistribution of stress to the periphery. No stress peaks were found to occur after sustained loading.
CONCLUSION: Stress peaks after sustained loading cannot explain the occurrence of endplate fractures in sustained cyclic compression in non-degenerated discs. Competing explanations, such as creep, and fatigue failure, would appear more likely candidates. RELEVANCE: It has been hypothesised that compression induced fractures of the lumbar vertebral endplate constitute an important etiological factor for low back pain. Competing theories exist on the fracture mechanism in sustained loading and these would have different implications with respect to prevention. The present study evaluated one of these theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11275351     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  7 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Paraspinal muscle control in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intradiscal pressure depends on recent loading and correlates with disc height and compressive stiffness.

Authors:  Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The distribution of mineral density in the cervical vertebral endplates.

Authors:  Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Stefan Weißer; Ulrich Linsenmeier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Differences in endplate deformation of the adjacent and augmented vertebra following cement augmentation.

Authors:  Paul A Hulme; S K Boyd; P F Heini; S J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry for imaging of degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Max Hans-Peter Gay; Gordian Born; Arne Mehrkens; Holger Wittig; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-02-12

Review 7.  In Vitro Studies for Investigating Creep of Intervertebral Discs under Axial Compression: A Review of Testing Environment and Results.

Authors:  Mengying Yang; Dingding Xiang; Song Wang; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.