Literature DB >> 17203276

Paraspinal muscle control in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Andrew M Briggs1, Alison M Greig, Kim L Bennell, Paul W Hodges.   

Abstract

The high risk of sustaining subsequent vertebral fractures after an initial fracture cannot be explained solely by low bone mass. Extra-osseous factors, such as neuromuscular characteristics may help to explain this clinical dilemma. Elderly women with (n = 11) and without (n = 14) osteoporotic vertebral fractures performed rapid shoulder flexion to perturb the trunk while standing on a flat and short base. Neuromuscular postural responses of the paraspinal muscles at T6 and T12, and deep lumbar multifidus at L4 were recorded using intramuscular electromyography (EMG). Both groups demonstrated bursts of EMG that were initiated either before or shortly after the onset of shoulder flexion (P < 0.05). Paraspinal and multifidus onset occurred earlier in the non-fracture group (50-0 ms before deltoid onset) compared to the fracture group (25 ms before and 25 ms after deltoid onset) in the flat base condition. In the short base condition, EMG amplitude increased significantly above baseline earlier in the non-fracture group (75-25 ms before deltoid onset) compared to the fracture group (25-0 ms before deltoid onset) at T6 and T12; yet multifidus EMG increased above baseline earlier in the fracture group (50-25 ms before deltoid) compared to the non-fracture group (25-0 ms before deltoid). Time to reach maximum amplitude was shorter in the fracture group. Hypothetically, the longer time to initiate a postural response and shorter time to reach maximum amplitude in the fracture group may indicate a neuromuscular contribution towards subsequent fracture aetiology. This response could also be an adaptive characteristic of the central nervous system to minimise vertebral loading time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17203276      PMCID: PMC2200788          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0276-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  43 in total

1.  Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preparatory trunk motion accompanies rapid upper limb movement.

Authors:  P Hodges; A Cresswell; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Feedforward contraction of transversus abdominis is not influenced by the direction of arm movement.

Authors:  P W Hodges; C A Richardson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity.

Authors:  R A Washburn; E McAuley; J Katula; S L Mihalko; R A Boileau
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The fracture risk index and bone mineral density as predictors of vertebral structural failure.

Authors:  Yunbo Duan; François Duboeuf; Françoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Aging and posture control: changes in sensory organization and muscular coordination.

Authors:  M H Woollacott; A Shumway-Cook; L M Nashner
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1986

9.  Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Sinaki; E Itoi; H W Wahner; P Wollan; R Gelzcer; B P Mullan; D A Collins; S F Hodgson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Posturo-kinetic organisation during the early phase of voluntary upper limb movement. 1. Normal subjects.

Authors:  M Zattara; S Bouisset
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Scores on the safe functional motion test are associated with prevalent fractures and fall history.

Authors:  Chris P Recknor; Stephanie L Grant; Julie C Recknor; Norma J Macintyre
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Is the timed loaded standing test a valid measure of back muscle endurance in people with vertebral osteoporosis?

Authors:  M Newman; R Newman; T Hughes; K Vadher; K L Barker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of an exercise and manual therapy program on physical impairments, function and quality-of-life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a randomised, single-blind controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Kim L Bennell; Bernadette Matthews; Alison Greig; Andrew Briggs; Anne Kelly; Margaret Sherburn; Judy Larsen; John Wark
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Abdominal body composition measured by quantitative computed tomography and risk of non-spine fractures: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  Y Sheu; L M Marshall; K F Holton; P Caserotti; R M Boudreau; E S Strotmeyer; P M Cawthon; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Efficacy of a specific rehabilitation protocol in postural control of a young woman with multiple fragility vertebral fractures: a case report.

Authors:  Gloria Raffaetà; Francesca Falossi; Agnese Menconi; Chiara Genovesi; Maurizio Mazzantini; Vanna Bottai; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-05-11

Review 7.  The Role of Trunk Musculature in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Implications for Prediction, Prevention, and Management.

Authors:  Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Impact of paravertebral muscle in thoracolumbar and lower lumbar regions on outcomes following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Hasibullah Habibi; Shinji Takahashi; Masatoshi Hoshino; Kazushi Takayama; Ryuichi Sasaoka; Tadao Tsujio; Hiroyuki Yasuda; Fumiaki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Shoichiro Ohyama; Yusuke Hori; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Glucocorticoid-induced bone loss is associated with abnormal intravertebral areal bone mineral density distribution.

Authors:  Louise I Manning; Andrew M Briggs; Sharon Van Doornum; Ashwini Kale; Susan Kantor; John D Wark
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.257

10.  Trunk muscle activity is modified in osteoporotic vertebral fracture and thoracic kyphosis with potential consequences for vertebral health.

Authors:  Alison M Greig; Andrew M Briggs; Kim L Bennell; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.