Literature DB >> 15719214

Prefrontal TMS produces smaller EEG responses than motor-cortex TMS: implications for rTMS treatment in depression.

Seppo Kähkönen1, Soile Komssi, Juha Wilenius, Risto J Ilmoniemi.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The stimulus intensity of prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) during depression treatment is usually determined by adjusting it with respect to the motor threshold (MT). There is some evidence that reactivity of the prefrontal cortex to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is lower than that of the motor cortex at MT stimulation. However, it is unknown whether this is true when other stimulus intensities are used. We investigated whether the magnitude and shape of the overall TMS-evoked electroencephalographic (EEG) responses differ between prefrontal and motor cortices.
METHODS: Magnetic pulses to the left motor and prefrontal cortices (the middle frontal gyrus identified from magnetic resonance images) were delivered at four intensities (60, 80, 100, and 120% of MT of the right abductor digiti minimi muscle) for six subjects. Simultaneously, EEG was recorded with 60 scalp electrodes.
RESULTS: Global mean-field amplitudes (GMFAs) reflecting overall cortical activity were significantly smaller after prefrontal- than after motor-cortex TMS. A significant positive correlation (r (s)=0.84, p<0.01) was found between GMFAs of motor- and prefrontal-cortex TMS across the experiments. However, when correlation between the responses of motor and prefrontal cortices was examined, significant positive correlations were found at 80 and 100% intensities only.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence that the prefrontal and motor cortices have different reactivity to TMS, but the MT may be used for determining the stimulus intensity of prefrontal rTMS treatment in depression, at least at motor threshold intensities or near to it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15719214     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-2197-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  24 in total

1.  Double-blind controlled investigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of resistant major depression.

Authors:  C Loo; P Mitchell; P Sachdev; B McDarmont; G Parker; S Gandevia
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  On the comparability of H-reflexes and MEPs.

Authors:  J Nielsen; H Morita; J Baumgarten; N Petersen; L O Christensen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

3.  Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J Virtanen; J Ruohonen; R Näätänen; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Ipsi- and contralateral EEG reactions to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Soile Komssi; Hannu J Aronen; Juha Huttunen; Martti Kesäniemi; Lauri Soinne; Vadim V Nikouline; Marko Ollikainen; Risto O Roine; Jari Karhu; Sauli Savolainen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F A Kozel; Z Nahas; C deBrux; M Molloy; J P Lorberbaum; D Bohning; S C Risch; M S George
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.198

6.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical excitability in major depression as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F Maeda; J P Keenan; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Ari A Gershon; Pinhas N Dannon; Leon Grunhaus
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Distinct differences in cortical reactivity of motor and prefrontal cortices to magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seppo Kähkönen; Juha Wilenius; Soile Komssi; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans.

Authors:  S Kähkönen; S Komssi; J Wilenius; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depression: relation between efficacy and stimulation intensity.

Authors:  Frank Padberg; Peter Zwanzger; Martin E Keck; Norbert Kathmann; Patrick Mikhaiel; Robin Ella; Philipp Rupprecht; Heike Thoma; Harald Hampel; Nicola Toschi; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  26 in total

1.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Interrelations between motivational stance, cortical excitability, and the frontal electroencephalogram asymmetry of emotion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Dennis J L G Schutter; Antoin D de Weijer; Julia D I Meuwese; Barak Morgan; Jack van Honk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Reproducibility of TMS-Evoked EEG responses.

Authors:  Pantelis Lioumis; Dubravko Kicić; Petri Savolainen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Maturation changes the excitability and effective connectivity of the frontal lobe: A developmental TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Määttä; Laura Säisänen; Elisa Kallioniemi; Timo A Lakka; Niina Lintu; Eero A Haapala; Päivi Koskenkorva; Eini Niskanen; Florinda Ferreri; Mervi Könönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Tobias Loetscher; Richard A L Macdonell; Amy Brodtmann
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

6.  Characterization of Glutamatergic and GABAA-Mediated Neurotransmission in Motor and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Using Paired-Pulse TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Robin F H Cash; Yoshihiro Noda; Reza Zomorrodi; Natasha Radhu; Faranak Farzan; Tarek K Rajji; Paul B Fitzgerald; Robert Chen; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Prefrontal rTMS for treating depression: location and intensity results from the OPT-TMS multi-site clinical trial.

Authors:  Kevin A Johnson; Mirza Baig; Dave Ramsey; Sarah H Lisanby; David Avery; William M McDonald; Xingbao Li; Elisabeth R Bernhardt; David R Haynor; Paul E Holtzheimer; Harold A Sackeim; Mark S George; Ziad Nahas
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  EEG responses to TMS are sensitive to changes in the perturbation parameters and repeatable over time.

Authors:  Silvia Casarotto; Leonor J Romero Lauro; Valentina Bellina; Adenauer G Casali; Mario Rosanova; Andrea Pigorini; Stefano Defendi; Maurizio Mariotti; Marcello Massimini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Methodology for combined TMS and EEG.

Authors:  Risto J Ilmoniemi; Dubravko Kicić
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.