Literature DB >> 11270549

Robot-assisted microsurgery: a feasibility study in the rat.

P D Le Roux1, H Das, S Esquenazi, P J Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Telerobotic surgery is a novel technology that can improve a surgeon's manual dexterity as well as the results achieved with microsurgical procedures.
METHODS: A prototype Robot-Assisted MicroSurgery (RAMS) microdexterity enhancement system developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and MicroDexterity Systems, Inc., was tested in 10 rats. Carotid arteriotomies were created and closed using either the RAMS system or conventional microsurgical techniques. The time required, the technical quality (vessel patency and suture line integrity), the error rate, and subjective difficulty were compared.
RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed using the RAMS system to manipulate the vessel but not to hold the needle or place the sutures. The precision, technical quality, and error rate of telerobotic surgery were similar to those of conventional techniques. However, the use of the RAMS system was associated with a twofold increase in the length of the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Surgery using a microdexterity enhancement system, or RAMS prototype, is feasible. With further development, such as a stereotelevisualization and haptic feedback system, this system could be used for telerobotic surgery in neurosurgical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11270549     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  9 in total

1.  Telerobotic anterior translocation of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  Jose Carlos Garcia; Gustavo Mantovani; Stephanie Gouzou; Philippe Liveneaux
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-02-18

2.  Inexpensive Monocular Pico-Projector-based Augmented Reality Display for Surgical Microscope.

Authors:  Chen Shi; Brian C Becker; Cameron N Riviere
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Comput Based Med Syst       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Current state-of-the-art and future perspectives of robotic technology in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez; Deepak Sambhara; Ehud Mendel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Microsurgical robotic system for vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  Yoshiki Ida; Naohiko Sugita; Takashi Ueta; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Keiji Tanimoto; Mamoru Mitsuishi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  Robotic-assisted microvascular surgery: skill acquisition in a rat model.

Authors:  Nicholas S Clarke; Johnathan Price; Travis Boyd; Stefano Salizzoni; Kenton J Zehr; Alejandro Nieponice; Pietro Bajona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-10

7.  Optical coherence tomography scanning with a handheld vitreoretinal micromanipulator.

Authors:  Sungwook Yang; Marcin Balicki; Robert A MacLachlan; Xuan Liu; Jin U Kang; Russell H Taylor; Cameron N Riviere
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

Review 8.  Medical Engineering and Microneurosurgery: Application and Future.

Authors:  Akio Morita; Shigeo Sora; Hirofumi Nakatomi; Kanako Harada; Naohiko Sugita; Nobuhito Saito; Mamoru Mitsuishi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Current Limitations of Surgical Robotics in Reconstructive Plastic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Youri P A Tan; Philippe Liverneaux; Jason K F Wong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.