Literature DB >> 11264676

Signal detection in amplitude-modulated maskers. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird.

U Langemann1, G M Klump.   

Abstract

Vertebrates have evolved mechanisms to exploit amplitude modulations in background noise for improving signal detection. However, the mechanisms underlying this masking release are not yet well understood. Here we present evidence for masking release observed in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris, Aves) that were trained in a Go/NoGo paradigm to report the detection of a short tone (20 ms) in 100% sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noise maskers (400 ms duration). Maskers centred at the tone frequency were composed of one, three, or five spectrally adjacent noise bands each of auditory filter bandwidth. Envelopes of the masking noise bands were either in-phase (i.e. coherent) or successively phase shifted by 90 degrees (i.e. incoherent). A release from masking of up to 28 dB was observed for detection of signals presented in dips of the envelope of coherent maskers compared with those presented in peaks of coherent maskers and in incoherent maskers. For maskers limited to one auditory filter (i.e. limited to the analysis channel tuned to the test signal) this masking release was about 10 dB less than that observed for maskers allowing a comparison across three or five auditory filters. This indicates that both within-channel cues and across-channel cues are important for signal detection. These behavioural data provide the reference for the study of responses of auditory forebrain neurons in the same species reported in a companion paper [Nieder & Klump (2001) Eur. J. Neurosci., 13, 1033-1044].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11264676     DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01464.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  14 in total

1.  Physiological correlates of comodulation masking release in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  D Pressnitzer; R Meddis; R Delahaye; I M Winter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Daniel Pressnitzer; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  In-air hearing of a diving duck: A comparison of psychoacoustic and auditory brainstem response thresholds.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Detection of modulated tones in modulated noise by non-human primates.

Authors:  Peter Bohlen; Margit Dylla; Courtney Timms; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 10.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.