Literature DB >> 36092766

Welfare of cattle during transport.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Clare Roberts, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Bernadette Earley, Sandra Edwards, Luigi Faucitano, Sonia Marti, Genaro C Miranda de La Lama, Leonardo Nanni Costa, Peter T Thomsen, Sean Ashe, Lina Mur, Yves Van der Stede, Mette Herskin.   

Abstract

In the framework of its Farm to Fork Strategy, the Commission is undertaking a comprehensive evaluation of the animal welfare legislation. The present Opinion deals with protection of cattle (including calves) during transport. Welfare of cattle during transport by road is the main focus, but other means of transport are also covered. Current practices related to transport of cattle during the different stages (preparation, loading/unloading, transit and journey breaks) are described. Overall, 11 welfare consequences were identified as being highly relevant for the welfare of cattle during transport based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence: group stress, handling stress, heat stress, injuries, motion stress, prolonged hunger, prolonged thirst, respiratory disorders, restriction of movement, resting problems and sensory overstimulation. These welfare consequences and their animal-based measures are described. A variety of hazards, mainly relating to inexperienced/untrained handlers, inappropriate handling, structural deficiencies of vehicles and facilities, poor driving conditions, unfavourable microclimatic and environmental conditions, and poor husbandry practices leading to these welfare consequences were identified. The Opinion contains general and specific conclusions relating to the different stages of transport for cattle. Recommendations to prevent hazards and to correct or mitigate welfare consequences have been developed. Recommendations were also developed to define quantitative thresholds for microclimatic conditions within the means of transport and spatial thresholds (minimum space allowance). The development of welfare consequences over time was assessed in relation to maximum journey duration. The Opinion covers specific animal transport scenarios identified by the European Commission relating to transport of unweaned calves, cull cows, the export of cattle by livestock vessels, the export of cattle by road, roll-on-roll-off ferries and 'special health status animals', and lists welfare concerns associated with these.
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Farm to Fork Strategy; animal welfare assessment; animal‐based measures; calves; cattle; hazards; quantitative thresholds; welfare consequences

Year:  2022        PMID: 36092766      PMCID: PMC9449995          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  308 in total

Review 1.  How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions.

Authors:  R M Sapolsky; L M Romero; A U Munck
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Benchmarking study of industry practices during commercial long haul transport of cattle in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  L A González; K S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; M Bryan; R Silasi; F Brown
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The long haul: risks associated with livestock transport.

Authors:  Michael Greger
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2007-12

4.  Description of a novel fatigue syndrome of finished feedlot cattle following transportation.

Authors:  Daniel U Thomson; Guy H Loneragan; Jamie N Henningson; Steve Ensley; Bhupinder Bawa
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Virginie Michel; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Sandra Edwards; Sean Ashe; Denise Candiani; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Cristina Rojo Gimeno; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-12

6.  Effect of transport stress on respiratory disease, serum antioxidant status, and serum concentrations of lipid peroxidation biomarkers in beef cattle.

Authors:  Norbert K Chirase; L Wayne Greene; Charles W Purdy; Raymond W Loan; Brent W Auvermann; David B Parker; Earl F Walborg; Donald E Stevenson; Yong Xu; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.156

7.  Pulmonary ventilation, mechanics, gas exchange and haemodynamics in calves following intratracheal inoculation of Pasteurella haemolytica.

Authors:  A Linden; D Desmecht; H Amory; G Daube; S Lecomte; P Lekeux
Journal:  Zentralbl Veterinarmed A       Date:  1995-10

8.  Livestock drivers' knowledge about dairy cow fitness for transport - A Danish questionnaire survey.

Authors:  M S Herskin; A Hels; I Anneberg; P T Thomsen
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.534

9.  Short communication: Risk factors for sonographically detectable udder edema in overbagged cows at dairy shows.

Authors:  M Balmer; M Alsaaod; M Boesiger; E Studer; R O'Brien; G Schuepbach-Regula; A Steiner
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 10.  Structured literature review of responses of cattle to viral and bacterial pathogens causing bovine respiratory disease complex.

Authors:  G P Grissett; B J White; R L Larson
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.