Literature DB >> 11257967

On binocular alternation.

D Alais1, R P O'Shea, C Mesana-Alais, I G Wilson.   

Abstract

Diaz-Caneja (1928) made some prescient observations about binocular rivalry. Being in French, however, his paper remained largely unknown to the broader research community. His findings are similar to those reported very recently by contemporary researchers who had independently observed similar phenomena. Using concentric circles and parallel lines as stimuli, Diaz-Caneja presented half of each form to opposite eyes to provoke binocular rivalry. He observed periods in the ensuing binocular alternations in which rivalry occurred between the good Gestalt forms, despite the fact that they were distributed between the eyes. He proposed that each half of a good form generates synchronised oscillations in the visual system, and that this synchronisation enables the dichoptically viewed halves of the one form to be perceived as a whole.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11257967     DOI: 10.1068/p3017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  19 in total

1.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Illusory colors promote interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chai-Youn Kim; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

3.  Multistable binocular feature-integrated percepts are frozen by intermittent presentation.

Authors:  Para Kang; Steven Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

Authors:  David Sutoyo; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Does feature integration affect resolution of multiple simultaneous forms of ambiguity?

Authors:  Ryan Lange; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Derived patterns in binocular rivalry networks.

Authors:  Casey O Diekman; Martin Golubitsky; Yunjiao Wang
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?

Authors:  Sjoerd M Stuit; Chris L E Paffen; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Understanding attentional modulation of binocular rivalry: a framework based on biased competition.

Authors:  Kevin Conrad Dieter; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.