Literature DB >> 11235681

Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

D Singh1, R H Maley, T Santucci, R S Macherey, S Bartley, R J Weyant, R J Landreneau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak from cervical esophagogastric anastomoses is a serious problem after esophagectomy. We explored the efficacy of partial or total mechanical anastomoses accomplished with the endoscopic linear cutting and stapling device as an alternative to hand-sewn anastomotic techniques.
METHODS: During a 42-month period, 93 patients undergoing either transhiatal esophagectomy or a three-incisional approach to esophagectomy underwent either hand-sewn (n = 43), partial mechanical (n = 16), or totally mechanical (n = 34) cervical esophagogastric anastomoses. The occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leak and the development of postoperative anastomotic stricturing requiring dilation therapy were analyzed between these groups using chi2.
RESULTS: All patients survived esophagectomy and were available for postoperative follow-up. Anastomotic leak developed in 10 patients (23%) with hand-sewn, 1 patient (6%) with partial mechanical, and 1 patient (3%) with total mechanical anastomoses (p < 0.05). Anastomotic stricture development paralleled the occurrence of anastomotic leak rate with 25 patients (58%) with hand-sewn, 3 patients (19%) with partial mechanical, and 6 patients (18%) with total mechanical anastomoses experiencing strictures requiring dilation therapy (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that partial or mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomoses created with the endoscopic stapling device may be superior to hand-sewn anastomotic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11235681     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02337-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

1.  Minimally invasive resection and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomotic techniques in the management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  John S Bolton; William C Conway; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Deng; Quan-Xing Liu; Dong Zhou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Completely Linear Stapled Versus Handsewn Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tarun Kumar; Ravi Krishanappa; Esha Pai; Raxith Sringeri; T B Singh; Jyoti Swain; Sindhuri Kondapavuluri; Manoj Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Transcervical gastric tube drainage facilitates patient mobility and reduces the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Matthew J Schuchert; Brian L Pettiford; Joshua P Landreneau; Jonathon Waxman; Arman Kilic; Ricardo S Santos; Michael S Kent; Amgad El-Sherif; Ghulam Abbas; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Clinical application of layered anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Zi-Jiang Zhu; Yong-Fan Zhao; Long-Qi Chen; Yang Hu; Lun-Xu Liu; Yun Wang; Ying-Li Kou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience.

Authors:  K H Kernstine; D T DeArmond; D M Shamoun; J H Campos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Bruno Walther; Jan Johansson; Folke Johnsson; Christer Staël Von Holstein; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A new three-layer-funnel-shaped esophagogastric anastomosis for surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Han-Lei Dan; Yang Bai; Hui Meng; Cong-Lin Song; Jie Zhang; Yong Zhang; Lei-Chi Wan; Ya-Li Zhang; Zhen-Shu Zhang; Dian-Yuan Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Postoperative extended-volume external-beam radiation therapy in high-risk esophageal cancer patients: a prospective experience.

Authors:  E Yu; P Tai; J Younus; R Malthaner; P Truong; L Stitt; G Rodrigues; R Ash; R Dar; B Yaremko; A Tomiak; B Dingle; M Sanatani; M Vincent; W Kocha; D Fortin; R Inculet
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.