Literature DB >> 12508344

A new three-layer-funnel-shaped esophagogastric anastomosis for surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Han-Lei Dan1, Yang Bai, Hui Meng, Cong-Lin Song, Jie Zhang, Yong Zhang, Lei-Chi Wan, Ya-Li Zhang, Zhen-Shu Zhang, Dian-Yuan Zhou.   

Abstract

AIM: To reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak, stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) for patients with esophageal carcinoma, and to evaluate the conventional method of esophagectomy and esophagogastroplasty modified by a new three-layer-funnel-shaped (TLF) esophagogastric anastomotic suturing technique.
METHODS: From January 1997 to October 1999, patients with clinical stage I and II (IIa and IIb) esophageal carcinoma, which met the enrollment criteria, were surgically treated by the new method (Group A) and by conventional operation (Group B). All the patients were followed at least for 6 months. Postoperative outcomes and complications were recorded and compared with the conventional method in the same hospitals and with that reported previously by McLarty et al in 1997 (Group C).
RESULTS: 58 cases with stage I and II (IIa and IIb) esophageal carcinoma, including 38 males and 20 females aged from 34 to 78 (mean age: 57), were surgically treated by the TLF anastomosis and 64 by conventional method in our hospitals from January 1997 to October 1999. The quality of swallowing was improved significantly (Wilcoxon W=2 142, P=0.0 001) 2 to 3 months after the new operation in Group A. Only one patient had a blind anastomatic fistula diagnosed by barium swallow test 2 months but healed up 3 weeks later. Postoperative complications occurred in 25 (43 %) patients, anastomotic stenosis in 8 (14 %), and GER in 13 (22 %). The incidences of postoperative anastomotic leak, stenosis and GER were significantly decreased by the TLF anastomosis method compared with that of conventional methods (chi(2)=6.566, P=0.038; chi(2)=10.214, P=0.006; chi(2)=21.265, P=0.000).
CONCLUSION: The new three-layer-funnel-shaped esophagogastric anastomosis (TLFEGA) has more advantages to reduce postoperative complications of anastomotic leak, stricture and GER.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12508344      PMCID: PMC4728241          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i1.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Intensify standardized therapy for esophageal and stomach cancer in tumor hospitals.

Authors:  S J Wang; D G Wen; J Zhang; X Man; H Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  [Cervical anastomotic stenosis after gastric tube reconstruction in esophageal carcinoma. Evaluation of a patient sample 1989-1995].

Authors:  C J Bruns; M Gawenda; B Wolfgarten; M Walter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1997

3.  Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J D Miller; M K Jain; C J de Gara; D Morgan; J D Urschel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a risk factor for laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  H B El-Serag; E J Hepworth; P Lee; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  J F Bosset; M Gignoux; J P Triboulet; E Tiret; G Mantion; D Elias; P Lozach; J C Ollier; J J Pavy; M Mercier; T Sahmoud
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; A Alexandrou; S C Murthy; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Outcome of esophageal adenocarcinoma detected during endoscopic biopsy surveillance for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  R Incarbone; L Bonavina; G Saino; D Bona; A Peracchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; R D Page; R J Donnelly
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Changes in the surgical management of esophageal cancer from 1970 to 1993.

Authors:  S G Swisher; K K Hunt; E C Holmes; M J Zinner; D W McFadden
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  2 in total

1.  Study on immune function of dendritic cells in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shen-Ren Chen; Yi-Ping Luo; Jin-Kun Zhang; Wei Yang; Zhi-Chao Zhen; Lin-Xin Chen; Wei Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Fluoroscopically guided three-tube insertion for the treatment of postoperative gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Guowen Yin; Qingyu Xu; Shixi Chen; Xiangjun Bai; Feng Jiang; Qin Zhang; Lin Xu; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.500

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.