Literature DB >> 11224617

Decision analysis for the cost-effective management of recurrent colorectal cancer.

K C Park1, J Schwimmer, J E Shepherd, M E Phelps, J R Czernin, C Schiepers, S S Gambhir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in addition to computed axial tomography (CT) is helpful in managing recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is no consensus on a management algorithm for CRC. However, when recurrence is suspected, CT is generally used for further evaluation and staging of disease.
METHODS: The authors used decision trees based on theoretical models to assess the cost-effectiveness of a CT + FDG PET strategy for the diagnosis and management of recurrent CRC compared with a CT-alone strategy. These theoretical models focus on patients with hepatic recurrence who are potentially curable through surgical hepatic resection. The population entering the decision trees consisted of patients with CRC who had undergone surgical resection of their primary CRC and who were suspected of having recurrence based on elevated levels of carcinoembryonic antigen.
RESULTS: The CT + FDG PET strategy was found to be cost-effective for managing patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels who were candidates for hepatic resection. The CT + FDG PET strategy was higher in mean cost by $429 per patient but resulted in an increase in the mean life expectancy of 9.527 days per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show, through rigorous decision tree analysis, the potential cost-effectiveness of FDG PET in the management of recurrent CRC. The decision trees can be used to model various features of the management of recurrent CRC, including the cost-effectiveness of other newly emerging technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224617      PMCID: PMC1421245          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  38 in total

Review 1.  Cost and health implications of cholesterol lowering.

Authors:  L Goldman; D J Gordon; B M Rifkind; S B Hulley; A S Detsky; D W Goodman; B Kinosian; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cancer treatment: rational allocation of resources based on decision analysis.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner; C E Desch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Comparison of cost-effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R E Patterson; R L Eisner; S F Horowitz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Authors:  A M Vernava; W E Longo; K S Virgo; M A Coplin; T P Wade; F E Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Optimal follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: what tests and how often?

Authors:  O Kronborg
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1994 May-Jun

6.  Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile?

Authors:  F Safi; K H Link; H G Beger
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Clinical value of whole-body positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Beets; F Penninckx; C Schiepers; L Filez; L Mortelmans; R Kerremans; R Aerts; M De Roo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  An evaluation of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test for monitoring patients with resected colon cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; T R Fleming; J S Macdonald; D G Haller; J A Laurie; C Tangen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; R B Black; C A Rich; J R Harvey; R A Baker; J M Watts; J Toouli
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Surgical treatment of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne; J Quin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

1.  PET scanning in malignancy: infant, adolescent or mature citizen?

Authors:  M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Survival of patients staged by FDG-PET before resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Barry A Siegal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Decision analysis for the cost-effective management of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth C Park; Judy Schwimmer; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  B B Chin; R L Wahl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Cost-effectiveness of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in tumours other than lung cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Salvatore Annunziata; Carmelo Caldarella; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-28

6.  Role of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; N Fusco; P Broccoli; M Maurici; M Yamgoue; R Danieli; S D'Urso; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: a way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Authors:  Astrid Langer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Can imaging help improve the survival of cancer patients?

Authors:  K Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  FDG-PET in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Theo J M Ruers; Cornelis J A Punt; Jan Willem Leer; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  PET/CT in Oncology: Current Status and Perspectives.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Martin Allen-Auerbach; David Nathanson; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2013-05-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.