Literature DB >> 8200237

Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

A M Vernava1, W E Longo, K S Virgo, M A Coplin, T P Wade, F E Johnson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The follow-up of patients after potentially curative resection of colon cancer has important clinical and financial implications for patients and society, yet the ideal surveillance strategy is unknown.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the current follow-up practice pattern of a large, diverse group of experts.
METHODS: The 1,663 members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons were asked, via a detailed questionnaire, how often they request nine discrete follow-up evaluations in their patients treated for cure with TNM Stage I, II, or III colon cancer over the first five posttreatment years. These evaluations were clinic visit, complete blood count, liver function tests, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, chest x-ray, bone scan, computerized tomographic scan, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy.
RESULTS: Forty-six percent (757/1663) completed the survey and 39 percent (646/1663) provided evaluable data. The results indicate that members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons generally conduct follow-up on their patients personally after performing colon cancer surgery (rather than sending them back to their referral source). Routine clinic visits and CEA levels are the most frequently performed items for each of the five years. The large majority (> 75 percent) of surgeons see their patients every 3 to 6 months for years 1 and 2, then every 6 to 12 months for years 3, 4, and 5. Approximately 80 percent of respondents obtain CEA levels every 3 to 6 months for years 1, 2, and 3, and every 6 to 12 months for years 4 and 5. Colonoscopy is performed annually by 46 to 70 percent of respondents, depending on year. A chest x-ray is obtained yearly by 46 to 56 percent, depending on year. The majority of the members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons do not routinely request computerized tomographic scan or bone scan at any time. There is great variation in the pattern of use of complete blood count and liver function tests. Members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons from the United States tend to follow their patients more closely than do those living in other countries. The intensity of follow-up does not markedly vary across TNM Stages I to III.
CONCLUSION: The surveillance strategies reported here rely most heavily on clinic visits and CEA level determinations, generally reflecting guidelines previously proposed in the current literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8200237     DOI: 10.1007/bf02050993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  31 in total

1.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

2.  Intensive or not surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer after curative resection.

Authors:  Gerardo Rosati
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Surveillance of patients following surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven Gan; Katherine Wilson; Paul Hollington
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Peritoneal recurrence of colon cancer detected by positron emission tomography: report of a case.

Authors:  S Yasuda; H Makuuchi; S Sadahiro; M Mukai; H Ishida; N Tokunaga; T Kimura; T Tajima; A Shohtsu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Surgeons' follow-up practice after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Mella; S N Datta; A Biffin; A G Radcliffe; R J Steele; J D Stamatakis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Lu; Jin-Hua Chen; Chun-Ru Chien; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Shih-Chuan Tsai; Wan-Yu Lin; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with "curative" surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Follow-up recommendations for colon cancer.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Jo-Anne P Attard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

9.  The role of postoperative surveillance in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kerry Hammond; David A Margolin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Diagnosis delay and follow-up strategies in colorectal cancer. Prognosis implications: a study protocol.

Authors:  Salvador Pita Fernández; Sonia Pértega Díaz; Beatriz López Calviño; Paloma González Santamaría; Teresa Seoane Pillado; Francisco Arnal Monreal; Francesc Maciá; María Antonia Sánchez Calavera; Alejandro Espí Macías; Manuel Valladares Ayerbes; Alejandro Pazos; Margarita Reboredo López; Luis González Saez; María Ramos Montserrat; Josep María Segura Noguera; Isabel Monreal Aliaga; Luis González Luján; María Martín Rabadán; Cristiane Murta Nascimento; Olga Pueyo; Marta Maia Boscá Watts; Elena Cabeza Irigoyen; Montserrat Casmitjana Abella; Marina Pinilla; Ana Costa Alcaraz; Amador Ruiz Torrejón; Andrea Burón Pust; Concepción García Aranda; María de Lluc Bennasar; Sergio Lafita Mainz; Maite Novella; Hermini Manzano; Catalina Vadell; Esther Falcó; Magdalena Esteva
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.