Literature DB >> 8348848

Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile?

F Safi1, K H Link, H G Beger.   

Abstract

Between 1978 and 1989, 1,045 of 1,399 patients (580 male and 474 female) underwent curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Of these patients, 350 (33 percent) had recurrences, another 16 (1.5 percent) developed a metachronous colorectal cancer, and 23 (2 percent) had cancers of other organs. An isolated locoregional recurrence was found in 75/350 (21 percent). The remaining 275/350 patients (79 percent) showed systemic dissemination of the carcinoma. Reoperations with curative intent were performed on 56/350 patients (16 percent). Only 21 of the 56 resected patients (38 percent), i.e., 21/350 (6 percent), were without recurrence at the end of the follow-up period on December 31, 1990. Despite a curative reoperation, 62 percent of the patients again developed recurrent growths. There is an imbalance between the efforts invested in tumor follow-up and the benefits gained. Further follow-up programs should be investigated in a controlled, prospective fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8348848     DOI: 10.1007/bf02238589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  13 in total

1.  Guidelines for follow up after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; R J Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Diagnostic performance of MDCT, PET/CT and gadoxetic acid (Primovist(®))-enhanced MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastases being considered for hepatic resection: initial experience in a single centre.

Authors:  V O Chan; J P Das; J F Gerstenmaier; J Geoghegan; R G Gibney; C D Collins; S J Skehan; D E Malone
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with "curative" surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Survival after rectal cancer: differences between hospital catchment areas. A nationwide study in Sweden.

Authors:  P Blomqvist; A Ekbom; O Nyrén; U B Krusemo; R Bergström; H O Adami
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Decision analysis for the cost-effective management of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K C Park; J Schwimmer; J E Shepherd; M E Phelps; J R Czernin; C Schiepers; S S Gambhir
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Surgical management of locally advanced and locally recurrent colon cancer.

Authors:  Ron G Landmann; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

7.  Prognostic significance of p53-expression in colorectal carcinoma as measured by a luminometric immunoassay.

Authors:  Oliver Lotter; Amro Amr; Farouk Safi
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-08

8.  Synuclein gamma predicts poor clinical outcome in colon cancer with normal levels of carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  Caiyun Liu; Bin Dong; Aiping Lu; Like Qu; Xiaofang Xing; Lin Meng; Jian Wu; Y Eric Shi; Chengchao Shou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Colon cancer: survival after curative surgery.

Authors:  K H Link; T A Sagban; M Mörschel; K Tischbirek; M Holtappels; V Apell; K Zayed; M Kornmann; L Staib
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy.

Authors:  R A Graham; S Wang; P J Catalano; D G Haller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.