Literature DB >> 11222971

Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: scalp topography and dipole sources.

P Ungan1, S Yagcioglu, C Goksoy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Being the two complementary cues to directional hearing, interaural time and intensity disparities (ITD and IID, respectively), are known to be separately encoded in the brain stem. We address the question as to whether their codes are collapsed into a single lateralization code subcortically or they reach the cortex via separate channels and are processed there in different areas.
METHODS: Two continuous trains of 100/s clicks were dichotically presented. At 2 s intervals either an interaural time delay of 1ms or an interaural level difference of 20 dB (HL) was introduced for 50 ms, shifting the intracranial sound image laterally for this brief period of time. Long-latency responses to these directional stimuli, which had been tested to evoke no potentials under monotic or diotic conditions, as well as to sound pips of 50 ms duration were recorded from 124 scalp electrodes. Scalp potential and current density maps at N1 latency were obtained from thirteen normal subjects. A 4-sphere head model with bilaterally symmetrical dipoles was used for source analysis and a simplex algorithm preceded by a genetic algorithm was employed for solving the inverse problem.
RESULTS: Inter- and intra-subject comparisons showed that the N1 responses evoked by IID and ITD as well as by sound pip stimuli had significantly different scalp topographies and interhemispheric dominance patterns. Significant location and orientation differences between their estimated dipole sources were also noted.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that interaural time and intensity disparities (thus the lateral shifts of a sound image caused by these two cues) are processed in different ways and/or in different areas in auditory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222971     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00550-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  16 in total

1.  Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A recency effect in sound localization?

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

5.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23

8.  Spinal and Cerebral Integration of Noxious Inputs in Left-handed Individuals.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.