Literature DB >> 11214274

Systematic methodology for the design of a flexible keel for energy-storing prosthetic feet.

T S Jang1, J J Lee, D H Lee, Y S Yoon.   

Abstract

An effective design method is suggested for a flexible keel design for energy-storing prosthetic feet (ESPF). The basic, two-dimensional shape of the keel is based on anthropometric data and normal gait analysis available in the literature. Cost function is defined for the performance evaluation of the keel. Five factors and five levels of their effect on the performance of the keel are established. By use of an orthogonal array table, 25 trials of dynamic simulations of prosthetic walking are designed, from among 3,125 possible combinations, dramatically reducing the number of total simulations needed to examine sufficiently the contribution of each factor to cost function. A prosthetic walking model is built, and a dynamic simulation of prosthetic walking is performed using the finite element method. The contribution of each factor to cost function is investigated by an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the average main effects of factors for cost function are calculated. The optimum combination of factor levels is obtained by minimisation of cost function. To examine the structural safety of the keel, the deformation and stress distribution of the keel are investigated by static analysis, and failure indices are calculated by three failure criteria. Finally, the optimum flexible keel is designed with increased energy storage capacity, without failure, and suitable for more active prosthetic walking; the recoverable strain energy stored in the optimum ESPF keel is 25.8J.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11214274     DOI: 10.1007/bf02345267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  12 in total

1.  Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.

Authors:  J M Czerniecki; A Gitter; C Munro
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor.

Authors:  K Postema; H J Hermens; J de Vries; H F Koopman; W H Eisma
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits.

Authors:  K Postema; H J Hermens; J de Vries; H F Koopman; W H Eisma
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait.

Authors:  D A Winter; S E Sienko
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces.

Authors:  A P Arya; A Lees; H C Nirula; L Klenerman
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Modelling and gait evaluation of asymmetrical-keel foot prosthesis.

Authors:  P Allard; F Trudeau; F Prince; J Dansereau; H Labelle; M Duhaime
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet.

Authors:  Y Ehara; M Beppu; S Nomura; Y Kunimi; S Takahashi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot.

Authors:  J F Lehmann; R Price; S Boswell-Bessette; A Dralle; K Questad
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Energy generation and absorption at the ankle and knee during fast, natural, and slow cadences.

Authors:  D A Winter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations.

Authors:  J M Casillas; V Dulieu; M Cohen; I Marcer; J P Didier
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.