Literature DB >> 9141123

Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor.

K Postema1, H J Hermens, J de Vries, H F Koopman, W H Eisma.   

Abstract

This paper is the second part of a study on biomechanical and functional properties of prosthetic feet. The first part dealt with a biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. This part deals with subjective ratings and deciding factors for trans-tibial amputees using 2 energy storing feet (ESF) and 2 conventional feet (CF). The Otto Bock Dynamic Pro and Hanger Quantum feet were used as ESF and the Otto Bock Multi Axial and Otto Bock Lager feet were used as CF. Ten trans-tibial amputees, active walkers, without stump problems, were selected (mean age: 49 years old). The study was designed as a double-blind, randomised trial and for each foot there was a habituation period of 2 weeks. Two questionnaires were designed. (A) concerned information about the preference of the subjects and (B) concerned the order of importance of difference aspects concerning a prosthesis. Results indicated that no clear preference for either the ESF or the CF existed and that the individual preference is not related to age. The items 'ability to walk fast' and 'no fatigue during walking', score statistically significantly worse for the CF2. With the small contrast between the ESF and CF, in relation to energy storing capacities, the subjects cannot distinguish between the ESF and CF. The 'absence of stump pain' and 'stability while walking' are ranked as most important aspects concerning a prosthesis. The perception of stability is likely to be related to the level and kind of activities the subject performs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9141123     DOI: 10.3109/03093649709164527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a prototype foot/ankle prosthesis.

Authors:  P M Quesada; M Pitkin; J Colvin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  2000-03

2.  Systematic methodology for the design of a flexible keel for energy-storing prosthetic feet.

Authors:  T S Jang; J J Lee; D H Lee; Y S Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.

Authors:  Heather A Underwood; Craig D Tokuno; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Effect of alignment changes on socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet.

Authors:  Toshiki Kobayashi; Adam K Arabian; Michael S Orendurff; Teri G Rosenbaum-Chou; David A Boone
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 5.  Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation.

Authors:  C Hofstad; H Linde; J Limbeek; K Postema
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

6.  Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.

Authors:  Alan R De Asha; Ramesh Munjal; Jai Kulkarni; John G Buckley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Han Houdijk; Daphne Wezenberg; Laura Hak; Andrea Giovanni Cutti
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.