Literature DB >> 19487757

Performance benefits and costs in forced choice perceptual identification in amnesia: Effects of prior exposure and word frequency.

Margaret M Keane1, Elizabeth Martin, Mieke Verfaellie.   

Abstract

Accuracy in identifying a perceptually degraded word (e.g., stake) can be either enhanced by recent exposure to the same stimulus or reduced by recent exposure to a similar stimulus (e.g., stare). In the present study, we explored the mechanisms underlying these benefits and costs by examining the performance of amnesic and control groups in a forced choice perceptual identification (FCPI) task in which briefly flashed words (that were identical to studied words, similar to studied words, or new) had to be identified, and two response choices were provided that differed from each other by one letter. Control participants showed a performance benefit and cost in FCPI with both high- and low-frequency words. Amnesic participants showed a benefit (but no cost) with high-frequency words and a benefit and a cost with low-frequency words. The benefit/cost pattern with low-frequency words in amnesia was obtained even when the to-be-identified stimulus in the FCPI task was eliminated (Experiment 2), suggesting that this effect was driven by processes operating at the level of the response choices. Our findings suggest that implicit memory effects in FCPI reflect the operation of multiple mechanisms, the relative contributions of which may vary with the frequency of the test stimuli. The results also highlight the need for caution in interpreting results from normal participants in the FCPI task, since those findings may reflect a contribution of explicit memory processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487757      PMCID: PMC2737272          DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.5.655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

Review 1.  A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: a note on the counter model.

Authors:  E J Wagenmakers; R Zeelenberg; L J Schooler; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Modeling the effects of repetition and word frequency in perceptual identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.

Authors:  L J Schooler; R M Shiffrin; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Priming in implicit memory tasks: prior study causes enhanced discriminability, not only bias.

Authors:  René Zeelenberg; Eric-Jan M Wagenmakers; Jeroen G W Raaijmakers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

5.  Counter model for word identification: reply to Bowers (1999).

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Bias in masked word identification: unconscious influences of repetition priming.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

7.  A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon; M Verwoerd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory.

Authors:  D L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Bias in auditory priming.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; D Allbritton; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  2 in total

1.  Attention and implicit memory: priming-induced benefits and costs have distinct attentional requirements.

Authors:  Margaret M Keane; Matt E Cruz; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

2.  Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator.

Authors:  Denise S Ryan; Rose K Sia; Jennifer B Eaddy; Lorie A Logan; Jide O Familoni; Hind Beydoun; Samantha B Rodgers; Bruce A Rivers
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2020-01-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.