Literature DB >> 11199437

[Full-field digital mammography].

U Bick1.   

Abstract

Due to the extremely high image quality requirements in mammography, there has for a long time been no adequate digital alternative to conventional film-screen mammography. The longest experience so far exists with digital mammography on the basis of storage phosphor (CR) systems. However, at normal dose this technique has a relatively poor signal-to-noise ratio and has not found general acceptance. Recently three novel systems for digital mammography by the companies Fischer (slot-scan detector), Trex (CCD-array), and GE (amorphous silicon detector) have been introduced and are currently under clinical investigation. The main advantage of digital mammography is the linear relationship between dose and detector signal with the possibility of a tailored optimization of image contrast. Other advantages include digital image storage, telemammography, and computer-assisted diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11199437     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical results of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Christian Sohns; Carola Werner; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  [Workflow in digital screening mammography].

Authors:  U Bick; F Diekmann; E M Fallenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  [Radiological diagnosis of mammary carcinomas. I: pathology and x-ray mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; H-P Sinn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Nermin Köşüş; Aydın Köşüş; Müzeyyen Duran; Serap Simavlı; Nilgün Turhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.