Literature DB >> 24591923

Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening.

Nermin Köşüş1, Aydın Köşüş1, Müzeyyen Duran1, Serap Simavlı1, Nilgün Turhan1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Screen-film mammography (SFM) has been considered the gold standard for breast cancer screening and detection. Despite its recognized value in detecting and characterizing breast disease, mammography has important limitations and its false-negative rate ranges from 4% to 34%. Given these limitations, development of imaging modalities that would enhance, complement, or replace mammography has been a priority. Digital mammography (FFDM) and digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) are some of these alternative modalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammography; breast cancer; digital infrared thermal imaging; digital mammography

Year:  2010        PMID: 24591923      PMCID: PMC3939224          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2010.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  28 in total

Review 1.  [Full-field digital mammography].

Authors:  U Bick
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2000-12

2.  Statistical analysis of healthy and malignant breast thermography.

Authors:  E Y Ng; L N Ung; F C Ng; L S Sim
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

3.  Numerical computation as a tool to aid thermographic interpretation.

Authors:  E Y Ng; N M Sudharsan
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

4.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Radhika A Ramanan; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview.

Authors:  Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  ACOG practice bulletin. Breast cancer screening. Number 42, April 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  The knowledge and attitudes of breast self-examination and mammography in a group of women in a rural area in western Turkey.

Authors:  Pinar Erbay Dündar; Dilek Ozmen; Beyhan Oztürk; Gökçe Haspolat; Filiz Akyildiz; Sümeyra Coban; Gamze Cakiroglu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  7 in total

1.  Folic Acid Preconditioning Alleviated Radiation-Induced Ovarian Dysfunction in Female Mice.

Authors:  Qianyu Zhang; Zhifu Wei; Huinan Weng; Ye Chen; Jie Zhang; Shiwei Mei; Jiahui Wei; Xiulan Zhu; Yingqi Nong; Jianxing Ruan; Wenjuan Liu; Ruiqiong Zhou; Fang Wang; Yanni Xie; Junjiu Huang; Xiqian Zhang; Fenghua Liu
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Reliability of Infrared Thermography Images in the Analysis of the Plantar Surface Temperature in Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Natália C M Silva; Hirlaine A Castro; Leonardo C Carvalho; Érika C L Chaves; Ludmila O Ruela; Denise H Iunes
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-01-17

3.  Best practices for standardized performance testing of infrared thermographs intended for fever screening.

Authors:  Pejman Ghassemi; T Joshua Pfefer; Jon P Casamento; Rob Simpson; Quanzeng Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The influence of size, depth and histologic characteristics of invasive ductal breast carcinoma on thermographic properties of the breast.

Authors:  Marko Mance; Krešimir Bulic; Anko Antabak; Milan Miloševic
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.068

Review 5.  The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables.

Authors:  Erik Vavrinsky; Niloofar Ebrahimzadeh Esfahani; Michal Hausner; Anton Kuzma; Vratislav Rezo; Martin Donoval; Helena Kosnacova
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 6.  Breast Cancer Detection Using Infrared Thermal Imaging and a Deep Learning Model.

Authors:  Sebastien Jean Mambou; Petra Maresova; Ondrej Krejcar; Ali Selamat; Kamil Kuca
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Medical applications of infrared thermography: A review.

Authors:  B B Lahiri; S Bagavathiappan; T Jayakumar; John Philip
Journal:  Infrared Phys Technol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.