Literature DB >> 15250098

[Radiological diagnosis of mammary carcinomas. I: pathology and x-ray mammography].

R Schulz-Wendtland1, H-P Sinn.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women: almost 10 % will suffer from breast cancer during their life and almost half of these will die of it. The spectrum of radiologic methods for diagnosing breast cancer is wide, including X-ray mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance mammography, and minimally invasive biopsies. After long-lasting controversies, breast cancer screening using X-ray mammography has now been introduced in Germany, following the projects in the Netherlands and Sweden. However, assessing mammographic films under screening conditions requires skills distinctly different from those needed under clinical conditions. This first part of two covers the histopathological basics and X-ray mammography; the second will deal with ultrasound of the breast and magnetic resonance mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15250098     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-004-1060-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  39 in total

Review 1.  The pressing need for better histologic-mammographic correlation of the many variations in normal breast anatomy.

Authors:  T Tot; L Tabár; P B Dean
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  [Current status of grading in breast cancer].

Authors:  R Bässler; W Böcker; P Hermanek; H Pickartz; K Prechtel; A Schauer; H G Schnürch; H E Stegner
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Consensus Conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ. The Consensus Conference Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  [Guidelines for pathology--supplement to European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Report by the Pathology Working Group of the European Community].

Authors:  J P Sloane; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Böcker; G Bussolati; C E Connolly; C De Miguel; P Dervan; R Drijkoningen; C W Elston; D Faverly; A Gad; R Holland; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; A Lindgren; J Martinez-Peñuela; J L Peterse; F Rank; V Tsakraklides; C de Wolf; B Zafrani
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?

Authors:  L Tabár; S W Duffy; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Results from a randomised study of 92 934 women in a Swedish county.

Authors:  G Fagerberg; L Baldetorp; O Gröntoft; B Lundström; J C Månson; B Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Acta Radiol Oncol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec

7.  Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality.

Authors:  R G Blanks; S M Moss; C E McGahan; M J Quinn; P J Babb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

8.  Breast conservation therapy in patients with mammographically undetected breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Samuels; B G Haffty; C H Lee; D B Fischer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.