Literature DB >> 11196722

Periprosthetic femoral fractures in Northern Ireland.

A L Ruiz1, N W Thompson, J G Brown.   

Abstract

Twenty-five patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures were admitted to the Ulster Hospital between August 1998 and May 2000. Average age was 77 years (range, 42-96 years) with a female to male ratio of 2:1. Twenty-four of the fractures occurred following primary joint arthroplasty on average 7.6 years from insertion of the primary prosthesis. One patient sustained an intraoperative fracture during revision surgery. In the majority (80%), the periprosthetic femoral fracture was associated with a traumatic event. On average, two days elapsed from the time of injury until admission to our unit. Time from admission to surgery was on average 4 days. All patients were treated by open fracture fixation. Duration of stay in the fracture unit was on average 20 days. Prior to their fracture 92% of patients were living at home and 84% were mobile either unaided or with the use of a stick. At most recent review, 72% are back living at home and 60% are mobile either unaided or with the use of a stick. We emphasise that there is the likelihood of an increase in periprosthetic femoral fractures due to the increasing number of primary arthroplasties being performed on a more active, ageing population. Preventative measures and cost implications are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11196722      PMCID: PMC2449187     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulster Med J        ISSN: 0041-6193


  8 in total

Review 1.  The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D S Garbuz; C P Duncan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Dall-Miles cable and plate system for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  F S Haddad; R A Marston; S K Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: principles of prevention and management.

Authors:  D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

5.  Results of an operative policy in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Authors:  G J McLauchlan; C M Robinson; B R Singer; J Christie
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures.

Authors:  R K Beals; S S Tower
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement.

Authors:  J E Johansson; R McBroom; T W Barrington; G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Novel reduction method for periprosthetic fractures around the femoral component of a hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Singh; F Asprou; R W Trickett; S A Jones
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.951

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.