OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcome of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures treated operatively. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis from 1986 to 1993. SETTING: Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients identified from a computer database as being admitted to the Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit with periprosthetic femoral fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome grade (good, fair, poor) dependent on integrity of fixation, refracture rate, and ability to perform activities of daily living analyzed against age, type of fracture, prosthetic alignment, loosening, and method of fixation. RESULTS: Type I fractures were more common in uncemented or loosely cemented prostheses, whereas type II fractures occurred predominantly in securely cemented prostheses. Type I fractures treated by revision had the poorest results. Outcome in type II fractures was equally good whether treated by internal fixation or by revision. Age, loosening, and prosthetic alignment did not influence outcome. The mortality rate in this series was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: If a prosthesis is loose, it should be revised, or treatment varies with fracture and prosthetic type. In type I fractures, an uncemented stem may be revised to a cemented one; however, a securely cemented prosthesis probably is better when fixed internally. Type II fractures should be fixed internally because there is less operative insult. Type III fractures probably are not related to the prosthesis and should be fixed internally according to normal practice. The results of an operative policy compare well with the results of conservative management and avoid the problems of long-term immobilization.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcome of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures treated operatively. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis from 1986 to 1993. SETTING: Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients identified from a computer database as being admitted to the Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit with periprosthetic femoral fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome grade (good, fair, poor) dependent on integrity of fixation, refracture rate, and ability to perform activities of daily living analyzed against age, type of fracture, prosthetic alignment, loosening, and method of fixation. RESULTS:Type I fractures were more common in uncemented or loosely cemented prostheses, whereas type II fractures occurred predominantly in securely cemented prostheses. Type I fractures treated by revision had the poorest results. Outcome in type II fractures was equally good whether treated by internal fixation or by revision. Age, loosening, and prosthetic alignment did not influence outcome. The mortality rate in this series was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: If a prosthesis is loose, it should be revised, or treatment varies with fracture and prosthetic type. In type I fractures, an uncemented stem may be revised to a cemented one; however, a securely cemented prosthesis probably is better when fixed internally. Type II fractures should be fixed internally because there is less operative insult. Type III fractures probably are not related to the prosthesis and should be fixed internally according to normal practice. The results of an operative policy compare well with the results of conservative management and avoid the problems of long-term immobilization.
Authors: Roope Sarvilinna; Heini S A Huhtala; Timo J S Puolakka; Juha K Nevalainen; K Jorma J Pajamäki Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2003-07-30 Impact factor: 3.075