Literature DB >> 11192100

The impact of maternal serum screening on the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome and the use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in South Australia.

T Cheffins1, A Chan, E A Haan, E Ranieri, R G Ryall, R J Keane, R Byron-Scott, H Scott, E M Gjerde, A M Nguyen, J H Ford, S Sykes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of maternal serum screening on the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome and on the use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in South Australia.
DESIGN: A descriptive population-based study.
SETTING: South Australia (population 1.48 million persons; approximately 20,000 births per year). PARTICIPANTS: Women who had births or terminations of pregnancy with Down's syndrome in 1982-1996, women who had maternal serum screening in 1991-1996, amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in 1986-1996.
METHODS: Analysis of data from multiple sources on maternal serum screening, amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, births and terminations of pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total prevalence and birth prevalence of Down's syndrome each year in 1982-1996; proportion of pregnant women using maternal serum screening in 1991-1996, and proportion using amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling by indication in 1986-1996, by age group.
RESULTS: Use of maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome increased from 17% when introduced in 1991 to 76% of women who gave birth in 1996. Between 1982 and 1986 and 1996, terminations of pregnancy for fetal Down's syndrome increased from 7.1 % to 75% and the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome fell by 60% from 1.05 to 0.42 per 1,000 births, against the background of an increase in total prevalence due to increasing maternal age. The use of amniocentesis increased from 5.8% in 1991 to 10.1% in 1996 mainly due to the increase among women younger than 35 years with maternal serum screening as the main reason. The increasing chorionic villus sampling rate among younger women stabilised at 0.4%, while the rate among older women decreased from 11.0% to 7.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of maternal serum screening in South Australia has resulted in increased use of any prenatal testing for Down's syndrome from about 7% (mainly older women having amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) to 84% of women (about 8% having direct amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling and 76% having maternal serum screening first). This has resulted in a significant fall in the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome. maternal serum screening was the first indication of Down's syndrome for about half the terminations of pregnancy for Down's syndrome in 1993-1996, including three quarters of those in younger women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11192100     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11668.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  10 in total

1.  Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies.

Authors:  R E Gilbert; C Augood; R Gupta; A E Ades; S Logan; M Sculpher; J H van Der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

2.  A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Janine Goujard; François Goffinet
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Socioeconomic barriers to informed decisionmaking regarding maternal serum screening for down syndrome: results of the French National Perinatal Survey of 1998.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Béatrice Blondel; Catherine de Vigan; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The future of neo-eugenics. Now that many people approve the elimination of certain genetically defective fetuses, is society closer to screening all fetuses for all known mutations?

Authors:  Armand Marie Leroi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  The prevalence of live birth Down syndrome in the region of Primorsko-goranska County in Croatia, 1996-2005: the impact of screening and amniocentesis.

Authors:  Bojana Brajenović-Milić; Igor Prpić; Oleg Petrović; Smiljana Ristić; Gordana Brumini; Miljenko Kapović
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-22

8.  Demographic Assessment of Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Agustín Huete-García; Mónica Otaola-Barranquero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Analysis of the Global Disease Burden of Down Syndrome Using YLDs, YLLs, and DALYs Based on the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Data.

Authors:  Qingting Bu; Rong Qiang; Hua Cheng; Anmin Wang; Huangtao Chen; Zhenyu Pan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Avoiding genetic genocide: understanding good intentions and eugenics in the complex dialogue between the medical and disability communities.

Authors:  Paul Steven Miller; Rebecca Leah Levine
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.