Literature DB >> 11191260

Measurement error correction using validation data: a review of methods and their applicability in case-control studies.

D Thürigen1, D Spiegelman, M Blettner, C Heuer, H Brenner.   

Abstract

Measurement error is a serious problem in the analysis of epidemiological data. In the past 20 years, a large number of methods for the correction of measurement error have been developed. While at the beginning mostly methods for cohort studies were considered, recently more attention has been paid to case-control studies. Although a variety of methods have been proposed, they are very rarely used in practice. To stimulate their use and further development, this article provides a comprehensive overview on methods developed for multivariable regression analysis of epidemiologic studies with validation data sets. The methods are systematically classified with respect to the underlying theory. An assessment of prerequisites, assumptions and performance of the available methods is given. Particular attention is paid to applicability to case-control studies and need for further research and development is pointed out.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11191260     DOI: 10.1177/096228020000900504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  12 in total

1.  Recommendations and proposed guidelines for assessing the cumulative evidence on joint effects of genes and environments on cancer occurrence in humans.

Authors:  Paolo Boffetta; Deborah M Winn; John P Ioannidis; Duncan C Thomas; Julian Little; George Davey Smith; Vincent J Cogliano; Stephen S Hecht; Daniela Seminara; Paolo Vineis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Likelihood-based methods for estimating the association between a health outcome and left- or interval-censored longitudinal exposure data.

Authors:  Kathleen A Wannemuehler; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Metrecia L Terrell; Michele Marcus
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Serum biomarkers for improved diagnostic of pancreatic cancer: a current overview.

Authors:  S Bünger; T Laubert; U J Roblick; J K Habermann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  Charles V Clevenger; Priscilla A Furth; Susan E Hankinson; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  A conditional expectation approach for associating ambient air pollutant exposures with health outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen A Wannemuehler; Robert H Lyles; Lance A Waller; Robert M Hoekstra; Mitchel Klein; Paige Tolbert
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  What is the prevalence of drug use in the general population? Simulating underreported and unknown use for more accurate national estimates.

Authors:  Natalie S Levy; Joseph J Palamar; Stephen J Mooney; Charles M Cleland; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.996

7.  The Queensland Study of Melanoma: environmental and genetic associations (Q-MEGA); study design, baseline characteristics, and repeatability of phenotype and sun exposure measures.

Authors:  Amanda J Baxter; Maria Celia Hughes; Marina Kvaskoff; Victor Siskind; Sri Shekar; Joanne F Aitken; Adele C Green; David L Duffy; Nicholas K Hayward; Nicholas G Martin; David C Whiteman
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.587

8.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Statistical adjustment of genotyping error in a case-control study of childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  Matthew N Cooper; Nicholas H de Klerk; Kathryn R Greenop; Sarra E Jamieson; Denise Anderson; Frank M van Bockxmeer; Bruce K Armstrong; Elizabeth Milne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Interviewer versus self-administered health-related quality of life questionnaires - does it matter?

Authors:  Milo A Puhan; Alka Ahuja; Mark L Van Natta; Lori E Ackatz; Curtis Meinert
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.