PURPOSE: Complete resection constitutes the only curative approach in pancreatic cancer but is possible only in a minority of patients due to advanced stages upon diagnosis. Consequently, early detection is crucial for curative treatment. Clinical routine still lacks efficient, non-invasive screening assays, and 80-90% of pancreatic carcinomas are detected at unresectable stages. A wide range of serum proteins have been in the focus of intensive search for biomarkers specific for pancreatic cancer. This article will give an overview on serum biomarkers with screening potential for pancreatic malignancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: PUBMED database was searched for articles, and 43 manuscripts were selected that provided data regarding biomarkers used, type of assay, study population, sample cohort quality and diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Superior values for diagnostic performance were shown for MIC-1, PAM4, OPN, HSP27, TPS, TSGF, and CAM17.1 as individual markers. Panels of biomarkers comprised CA 19-9, MCSF, CEA, SAA, Haptoglobin, TSGF, CA 242, and HSP27. Individually or in concerted form, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 77 to 100% and 84-100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While the above named markers show high screening potential for pancreatic cancer, standardized validation studies using multiplex assays are required to pave the way for clinical routine application.
PURPOSE: Complete resection constitutes the only curative approach in pancreatic cancer but is possible only in a minority of patients due to advanced stages upon diagnosis. Consequently, early detection is crucial for curative treatment. Clinical routine still lacks efficient, non-invasive screening assays, and 80-90% of pancreatic carcinomas are detected at unresectable stages. A wide range of serum proteins have been in the focus of intensive search for biomarkers specific for pancreatic cancer. This article will give an overview on serum biomarkers with screening potential for pancreatic malignancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: PUBMED database was searched for articles, and 43 manuscripts were selected that provided data regarding biomarkers used, type of assay, study population, sample cohort quality and diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Superior values for diagnostic performance were shown for MIC-1, PAM4, OPN, HSP27, TPS, TSGF, and CAM17.1 as individual markers. Panels of biomarkers comprised CA 19-9, MCSF, CEA, SAA, Haptoglobin, TSGF, CA 242, and HSP27. Individually or in concerted form, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 77 to 100% and 84-100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While the above named markers show high screening potential for pancreatic cancer, standardized validation studies using multiplex assays are required to pave the way for clinical routine application.
Authors: A Brazma; P Hingamp; J Quackenbush; G Sherlock; P Spellman; C Stoeckert; J Aach; W Ansorge; C A Ball; H C Causton; T Gaasterland; P Glenisson; F C Holstege; I F Kim; V Markowitz; J C Matese; H Parkinson; A Robinson; U Sarkans; S Schulze-Kremer; J Stewart; R Taylor; J Vilo; M Vingron Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Chris F Taylor; Norman W Paton; Kathryn S Lilley; Pierre-Alain Binz; Randall K Julian; Andrew R Jones; Weimin Zhu; Rolf Apweiler; Ruedi Aebersold; Eric W Deutsch; Michael J Dunn; Albert J R Heck; Alexander Leitner; Marcus Macht; Matthias Mann; Lennart Martens; Thomas A Neubert; Scott D Patterson; Peipei Ping; Sean L Seymour; Puneet Souda; Akira Tsugita; Joel Vandekerckhove; Thomas M Vondriska; Julian P Whitelegge; Marc R Wilkins; Ioannnis Xenarios; John R Yates; Henning Hermjakob Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: David V Gold; Michael Goggins; David E Modrak; Guy Newsome; Mengling Liu; Chanjuan Shi; Ralph H Hruban; David M Goldenberg Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Diane M Simeone; Baoan Ji; Mousumi Banerjee; Thiruvengadam Arumugam; Dawei Li; Michelle A Anderson; Ann Marie Bamberger; Joel Greenson; Randal E Brand; Vijaya Ramachandran; Craig D Logsdon Journal: Pancreas Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Maria Pini; Davina H Rhodes; Karla J Castellanos; Andrew R Hall; Robert J Cabay; Rohini Chennuri; Eileen F Grady; Giamila Fantuzzi Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Ming T Cheah; James Y Chen; Debashis Sahoo; Humberto Contreras-Trujillo; Anne K Volkmer; Ferenc A Scheeren; Jens-Peter Volkmer; Irving L Weissman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205