Literature DB >> 11189090

Minorities, women, and clinical cancer research: the charge, promise, and challenge.

S M Underwood1.   

Abstract

Significant progress has been made since the war against cancer was launched. Discoveries in molecular medicine, genetics, and epidemiology have led to the recognition that certain cancers are potentially preventable and that elements of lifestyle, along with genetic, hormonal, and metabolic factors can be altered to reduce cancer risk. Advances in medical technology have led to the development of new imaging methods and computer technologies that can aid in efforts to detect, diagnosis, and treat cancer. Since the offensive against cancer was initiated, cancer treatments have become more powerful, more precise, less drastic, and safer. As a result, cancer incidence and mortality have begun to decline. Yet, while the nation boasts of the progress being achieved relative to cancer incidence and mortality, and federal research agencies retort that research applies to all populations, it is apparent that the declines do not translate to all populations in the United States. Clinical research is essential to cancer prevention and control. Within the oncology community, clinical cancer research trials are viewed as an efficient and economical way for patients to secure state-of-the-science medical care. Recognizing the need to improve access to state-of-the-science cancer treatment and control programs, minority and female participation in clinical cancer research trials has been encouraged. This recommendation is based on the belief that increased participation in well-designed clinical cancer research trials adhering to strict protocols and quality controls will, not only help validate the application of research findings to minority and female populations, but also result in better patient outcomes. Born out of a commitment to social equity, justice, beneficence, and the desire to ensure that data relevant to cancer prevention and control are both valid and generalizable to populations across the United States, several programs of research aimed toward increasing the representation of women and minorities in clinical cancer research have been pursued by the National Cancer Institute. This issue of the Annals of Epidemiology Minorities, Women, and Clinical Cancer Research presents issues and challenges that face the research community and descriptions of effective models, strategies, and practices that may be used to increase the participation of minorities and women in clinical cancer research trials and facilitate the conduct of research directed toward reducing the cancer burden within the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11189090     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00200-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  13 in total

1.  An innovative path to improving cancer care in Indian country.

Authors:  L Burhansstipanov; A Gilbert; K LaMarca; L U Krebs
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A Community-Driven Intervention for Improving Biospecimen Donation in African American Communities.

Authors:  Kushal Patel; Wendelyn Inman; Jemal Gishe; Owen Johnson; Elizabeth Brown; Mohamed Kanu; Rosemary Theriot; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela Hull; Margaret Hargreaves
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-02-08

3.  Strategies for Recruitment of Healthy Premenopausal Women into the African American Nutrition for Life (A NULIFE) Study.

Authors:  Denae W King; Theresa M Duello; Patricia Y Miranda; Kelly P Hodges; Andrea J Shelton; Paul Chukelu; Lovell A Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  The Illinois Women's Health Registry: advancing women's health research and education in Illinois, USA.

Authors:  Sarah Bristol-Gould; Michelle Desjardins; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2010-03

5.  Clinical trials: understanding and perceptions of female Chinese-American cancer patients.

Authors:  Shin-Ping Tu; Hueifang Chen; Anthony Chen; Jeanette Lim; Suepattra May; Charles Drescher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Asian Americans and cancer clinical trials: a mixed-methods approach to understanding awareness and experience.

Authors:  Debora A Paterniti; Moon S Chen; Christine Chiechi; Laurel A Beckett; Nora Horan; Corinne Turrell; Ligaya Smith; Claudia Morain; Lisa Montell; Jose Luis Gonzalez; Sharon Davis; Primo N Lara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  On using a cancer center cancer registry to identify newly affected women eligible for hereditary breast cancer syndrome testing: practical considerations.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Christopher A Loffredo; Marilyn L Sampilo; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.

Authors:  Darcell P Scharff; Katherine J Mathews; Pamela Jackson; Jonathan Hoffsuemmer; Emeobong Martin; Dorothy Edwards
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-08

9.  Understanding the lived experience of Latino adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Farya Phillips; Barbara L Jones
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Recruitment of minority and underserved populations in the United States: the Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities experience.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Katherine W Reeves; John M McLaughlin; Mira L Katz; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Mack T Ruffin; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Cristina Merete; Faith Davis; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.