Literature DB >> 20187725

The Illinois Women's Health Registry: advancing women's health research and education in Illinois, USA.

Sarah Bristol-Gould1, Michelle Desjardins, Teresa K Woodruff.   

Abstract

To achieve the goal of personalized medicine, we must first improve our understanding of the differences in health and illness between men and women. The purpose of the Illinois Women's Health Registry (USA) is to provide a research and education tool that advances scientific knowledge of sex- and gender-based differences in health and disease. Specifically, the Registry is a confidential 30-min health and lifestyle survey for female residents of Illinois over the age of 18 years. The survey includes questions regarding health, environment, health-related behaviors, symptoms and illnesses or conditions that a participant may have now or has had in the past. By enrolling in the Registry, women throughout the state are provided with information and access to clinical research studies that they may be eligible for, based on their self-reported health information. The Registry not only serves as a platform for recruitment into pivotal research studies, but also represents the beginning of a state-wide database that enables researchers to examine the collective de-identified health information provided by women living in Illinois. Ultimately, a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of these data will help to clarify the issues that women themselves identify as their main health concerns. In response to these concerns, specific research studies can be designed and launched, allowing us to eventually deliver tailored treatment and prevention options to women. Finally, by creating a reliable state-focused research tool, developed by staff that are trained in women's health research, we can compare health issues across the state and apply strategies for improvement where it is needed most. This article will provide examples of sex differences in disease, the lack of federal enforcement for inclusion of women in studies, researcher-perceived burdens and sex-based reasons as to why recruitment of women is considered to be more challenging. In addition, this article will discuss what a women's health registry is and why we need one in Illinois, how we have recruited women and our successes and challenges. Our goal is to inform the reader about the utility of a state-based tool and to provide a discussion regarding the lessons learned in order to aid other states in implementing this kind of program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20187725      PMCID: PMC2848073          DOI: 10.2217/whe.10.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)        ISSN: 1745-5057


  23 in total

1.  Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials.

Authors:  D R Brown; M N Fouad; K Basen-Engquist; G Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Status of women in cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  Esther S H Kim; Venu Menon
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials.

Authors:  L F Hutchins; J M Unger; J J Crowley; C A Coltman; K S Albain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Physiological changes during the menstrual cycle and their effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs.

Authors:  A D Kashuba; A N Nafziger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Women's health and women's leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling?

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Claudia Morrissey; Stacie E Geller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; David Gordon; J Michael Gaziano; Joann E Manson; Charles H Hennekens; Julie E Buring
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Sex differences in HIV-1 viral load and progression to AIDS.

Authors:  H Farzadegan; D R Hoover; J Astemborski; C M Lyles; J B Margolick; R B Markham; T C Quinn; D Vlahov
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pain sensations to the cold pressor test in normally menstruating women: comparison with men and relation to menstrual phase and serum sex steroid levels.

Authors:  Kent Stening; Olle Eriksson; Liskarin Wahren; Göran Berg; Mats Hammar; Anders Blomqvist
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Recruitment of women research participants: the Women's Health Registry at the University of Michigan.

Authors:  Juliet L Rogers; Timothy R B Johnson; Morton B Brown; Paula M Lantz; Ardeth Greene; Yolanda R Smith
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Sex differences in perceived risks, distrust, and willingness to participate in clinical trials: a randomized study of cardiovascular prevention trials.

Authors:  Eric L Ding; Neil R Powe; JoAnn E Manson; Noëlle S Sherber; Joel B Braunstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.

Authors:  Alison M Kim; Candace M Tingen; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Attitudes toward Potential Participant Registries.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Andrew Holbrook; Aimee Pierce; Dan Hoang; Daniel L Gillen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Frontiers: Integration of a Research Participant Registry with Medical Clinic Registration and Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Patricia M Kluding; Jo Denton; T Rene Jamison; William Brooks; Karen Blackwell; John D Lantos; Lemuel R Waitman; Tamara M McMahon; Arvinder Choudhary; Marjorie J Bott; Allen Greiner; Susan Klaus; Amy O'Brien-Ladner; Lauren S Aaronson; Jeffrey Burns; Richard Barohn
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.689

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.