BACKGROUND: Although African American women have an overall lower incidence of breast cancer, African American women <40 years of age are more likely than Caucasian women of all ages and postmenopausal African American women to be diagnosed with breast cancer and exhibit tumor characteristics associated with poorer survival. To begin to address this disparity, studies must be conducted to examine breast cancer preventive factors in this subpopulation of women. However, the strategies needed to recruit younger African American women have not been well defined. METHODS: In this study, we assessed methods used for recruiting and retaining healthy premenopausal African American women into the African American Nutrition for Life (A NULIFE) Study. The number of women contacted, enrolled, and retained by each recruitment strategy and the efficiency of individual strategies were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, recruitment through social networking was most effective in contacting large numbers of healthy premenopausal African American women. The worksite recruitment method was the most efficient recruitment strategy employed, with a ratio of 40%. The study participants (n = 164) were more likely to be >or=35 years of age and have completed some college. Additionally, the interpersonal relationships recruitment approach proved most efficient (33%) in retaining participants who completed the yearlong study. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study add to the evolving research literature on minority recruitment strategies for research studies but specifically address effective recruitment of healthy young premenopausal African American women. The results demonstrate the need to use multiple recruitment strategies when recruiting this subgroup of African American women.
BACKGROUND: Although African American women have an overall lower incidence of breast cancer, African American women <40 years of age are more likely than Caucasian women of all ages and postmenopausal African American women to be diagnosed with breast cancer and exhibit tumor characteristics associated with poorer survival. To begin to address this disparity, studies must be conducted to examine breast cancer preventive factors in this subpopulation of women. However, the strategies needed to recruit younger African American women have not been well defined. METHODS: In this study, we assessed methods used for recruiting and retaining healthy premenopausal African American women into the African American Nutrition for Life (A NULIFE) Study. The number of women contacted, enrolled, and retained by each recruitment strategy and the efficiency of individual strategies were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, recruitment through social networking was most effective in contacting large numbers of healthy premenopausal African American women. The worksite recruitment method was the most efficient recruitment strategy employed, with a ratio of 40%. The study participants (n = 164) were more likely to be >or=35 years of age and have completed some college. Additionally, the interpersonal relationships recruitment approach proved most efficient (33%) in retaining participants who completed the yearlong study. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study add to the evolving research literature on minority recruitment strategies for research studies but specifically address effective recruitment of healthy young premenopausal African American women. The results demonstrate the need to use multiple recruitment strategies when recruiting this subgroup of African American women.
Authors: Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Sue Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Richard P Troiano; Kevin Dodd; Arthur Schatzkin; Sheila A Bingham; Pietro Ferrari; Victor Kipnis Journal: J Nutr Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Q Xiong; V Valero; V Kau; S W Kau; S Taylor; T L Smith; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi; R L Theriault Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mona N Fouad; Giselle Corbie-Smith; David Curb; Barbara V Howard; Charles Mouton; Michael Simon; Greg Talavera; Joanice Thompson; Ching-Yun Wang; Cornelia White; Rosalie Young Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2004-08
Authors: Denae King; Patricia Miranda; Beverly Gor; Robin Fuchs-Young; Janice Chilton; Richard Hajek; Isabel Torres-Vigil; Mariá A Hernández-Valero; S Amy Snipes; Lovell Jones Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marlene H Peters-Lawrence; Margaret C Bell; Lewis L Hsu; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Phillip Seaman; Miren Blackwood; Edouard Guillaume; Rita Bellevue; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Wally R Smith; Carlton D Dampier; Caterina P Minniti Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Elizabeth Barr; Karine Dubé; Shobha Swaminathan; Carlos Del Rio; Danielle M Campbell; Marta Paez-Quinde; Susan E Cohn Journal: HIV Res Clin Pract Date: 2021-06-18