Literature DB >> 11185795

The irrelevant sound effect: does speech play a special role?

S Tremblay1, A P Nicholls, D Alford, D M Jones.   

Abstract

Memory for order is markedly impaired by the presence of irrelevant sound, even though participants are instructed to ignore the sound. Although a great deal of research has disclosed some features of the task and of the sound that augment or reduce the degree of interference, one important issue of the irrelevant sound effect not yet resolved is whether speech has a special status. This study revealed, within a design of adequate power, that the same physical stimulus (sine wave speech), whether perceived as speech or as nonspeech sound, produces similar degrees of disruption and is less disruptive of serial recall than natural speech. This outcome suggests that the acoustic constituents of sound rather than its source are most influential in determining the impact of irrelevant material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11185795     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  The impact of auditory distraction on retrieval of visual memories.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

3.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

4.  The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Josh Dorsi; Stephanie George
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Effects of temporally regular versus irregular distractors on goal-directed cognition and behavior.

Authors:  Troby Ka-Yan Lui; Malte Wöstmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

7.  Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Nick Perham; Patrik Sörqvist; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

8.  Acoustic Detail But Not Predictability of Task-Irrelevant Speech Disrupts Working Memory.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dissociating the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Music and Speech on Serial Recall of Tonal and Verbal Sequences.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Hanna Meinhardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.