Literature DB >> 11182795

Dependence of the yield of DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells on the photon energy of ultrasoft X rays.

C M de Lara1, M A Hill, T J Jenner, D Papworth, P O'Neill.   

Abstract

Induction of DNA DSBs by low-LET radiations reflects clustered damage produced predominantly by low-energy, secondary electron "track ends". Cell inactivation and induction of DSBs and their rejoining, assayed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, were determined in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells irradiated as a monolayer with characteristic carbon K-shell (CK) (0.28 keV), aluminum K-shell (AlK) (1.49 keV), and titanium K-shell (TiK) (4.55 keV) ultrasoft X rays under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Relative to (60)Co gamma rays, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for cell inactivation at 10% survival and for induction of DSBs increases as the photon energy of the ultrasoft X rays decreases. The RBE values for cell inactivation and for induction of DSBs by CK ultrasoft X rays are 2.8 +/- 0.3 and 2.7 +/- 0.3, respectively, and by TiK ultrasoft X rays are 1.5 +/- 0.1 and 1.4 +/- 0.1, respectively. Oxygen enhancement ratios (OERs) of approximately 2 for cell inactivation and induction of DSBs by ultrasoft X rays are independent of the photon energy. The time scale for rejoining of DNA DSBs is similar for both ultrasoft X rays and 60Co gamma rays. From the size distribution of small DNA fragments down to 0.48 kbp, we concluded that DSBs are induced randomly by CK and AlK ultrasoft X rays. Therefore, ultrasoft X rays are more efficient per unit dose than gamma radiation at inducing DNA DSBs, the yield of which increases with decreasing photon energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11182795     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0440:dotyod]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  14 in total

1.  The role of atomic inner shell relaxations for photon-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Philipp Bernhardt; Werner Friedland; Herwig G Paretzke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-07-02       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  First steps towards systems radiation biology studies concerned with DNA and chromosome structure within living cells.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Herwig G Paretzke; Francesca Ballarini; Andrea Ottolenghi; Gregor Kreth; Christoph Cremer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  An ultrasoft X-ray multi-microbeam irradiation system for studies of DNA damage responses by fixed- and live-cell fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Carel van Oven; Przemek M Krawczyk; Jan Stap; Arline M Melo; Maria H O Piazzetta; Angelo L Gobbi; Henk A van Veen; Jan Verhoeven; Jacob A Aten
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Estimated yield of double-strand breaks from internal exposure to tritium.

Authors:  Jing Chen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Clustered DNA damage induced by gamma radiation in human fibroblasts (HF19), hamster (V79-4) cells and plasmid DNA is revealed as Fpg and Nth sensitive sites.

Authors:  Melanie Gulston; Jonathan Fulford; Terry Jenner; Catherine de Lara; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mixed secondary chromatin structure revealed by modeling radiation-induced DNA fragment length distribution.

Authors:  Wenzong Ma; Chenyang Gu; Lin Ma; Caoqi Fan; Chao Zhang; Yujie Sun; Cheng Li; Gen Yang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 6.038

7.  The dynamics of Ku70/80 and DNA-PKcs at DSBs induced by ionizing radiation is dependent on the complexity of damage.

Authors:  Pamela Reynolds; Jennifer A Anderson; Jane V Harper; Mark A Hill; Stanley W Botchway; Anthony W Parker; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  An Expanded Multi-scale Monte Carlo Simulation Method for Personalized Radiobiological Effect Estimation in Radiotherapy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Yuanming Feng; Wei Wang; Chengwen Yang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage - when is a DSB not a DSB?

Authors:  Pamela Reynolds; Stanley W Botchway; Anthony W Parker; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.