Literature DB >> 15235795

The role of atomic inner shell relaxations for photon-induced DNA damage.

Philipp Bernhardt1, Werner Friedland, Herwig G Paretzke.   

Abstract

The influence of relaxations of atoms making up the DNA and atoms attached to it on radiation-induced cellular DNA damage by photons was studied by very detailed Monte Carlo track structure calculations, as an unusually high importance of inner shell ionizations for biological action was suspected from reports in the literature. For our calculations cross sections for photons and electrons for inner shell orbitals were newly derived and integrated into the biophysical track structure simulation programme PARTRAC. Both the local energy deposition in a small sphere around the interacting relaxed atom, and the number of relaxations per Gy and Gbp were calculated for several target geometries and many monoenergetic photon irradiations. Elements with the highest order number yielded the largest local energy deposition after interaction. The atomic relaxation after ionization of the L1 shell was found to be more biologically efficient than that of the K shell for high Z atoms. Generally, the number of inner shell relaxations produced by photon irradiation was small in comparison to the total number of double strand breaks generated by such radiation. Furthermore, the energy dependence of the total number of photon-induced and electron-induced relaxations at the DNA atoms does not agree with observed RBE values for different biological endpoints. This suggests that the influence of inner shell relaxations of DNA atoms on radiation-induced DNA damage is in general rather small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15235795     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-004-0238-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  40 in total

1.  Strand break induction by photoabsorption in DNA-bound molecules.

Authors:  C Le Sech; K Takakura; C Saint-Marc; H Frohlich; M Charlier; N Usami; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  A new DNA target model for track structure calculations and its first application to I-125 Auger electrons.

Authors:  E Pomplun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Detection of Auger enhancement induced in HeLa cells labeled with iododeoxyuridine and irradiated with 150 kV x-rays--Effects of cysteamine and dimethylsulfoxide.

Authors:  K Shinohara; H Nakano; H Ohara
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  A Monte Carlo treatment of the decay of 125I.

Authors:  D E Charlton; J Booz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Auger electron spectra--the basic data for understanding the Auger effect.

Authors:  E Pomplun
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  The effect of 29 kV X rays on the dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  E Schmid; D Regulla; H-M Kramer; D Harder
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Crystal structure of a double-stranded DNA containing a cisplatin interstrand cross-link at 1.63 A resolution: hydration at the platinated site.

Authors:  F Coste; J M Malinge; L Serre; W Shepard; M Roth; M Leng; C Zelwer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  1 A crystal structures of B-DNA reveal sequence-specific binding and groove-specific bending of DNA by magnesium and calcium.

Authors:  T K Chiu; R E Dickerson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Production and dosimetry of copper L ultrasoft x-rays for biological and biochemical investigations.

Authors:  M A Hill; M D Vecchia; K M Townsend; D T Goodhead
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The primary mode of binding of cisplatin to a B-DNA dodecamer: C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G.

Authors:  R M Wing; P Pjura; H R Drew; R E Dickerson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  6 in total

1.  Convergence of nanotechnology with radiation therapy-insights and implications for clinical translation.

Authors:  Dev Kumar Chatterjee; Tatiana Wolfe; Jihyoun Lee; Aaron P Brown; Pankaj Kumar Singh; Shanta Raj Bhattarai; Parmeswaran Diagaradjane; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.241

2.  Efficacy of intracerebral delivery of cisplatin in combination with photon irradiation for treatment of brain tumors.

Authors:  Julia Rousseau; Rolf F Barth; Manuel Fernandez; Jean-François Adam; Jacques Balosso; François Estève; Hélène Elleaume
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Enhanced survival and cure of F98 glioma-bearing rats following intracerebral delivery of carboplatin in combination with photon irradiation.

Authors:  Julia Rousseau; Caroline Boudou; Rolf F Barth; Jacques Balosso; François Estève; Hélène Elleaume
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Intracerebral delivery of carboplatin in combination with either 6 MV photons or monoenergetic synchrotron X-rays are equally efficacious for treatment of the F98 rat glioma.

Authors:  Laure Bobyk; Magali Edouard; Pierre Deman; Julia Rousseau; Jean-François Adam; Jean-Luc Ravanat; François Estève; Jacques Balosso; Rolf F Barth; Hélène Elleaume
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20

5.  Tumoricidal activity of low-energy 160-KV versus 6-MV X-rays against platinum-sensitized F98 glioma cells.

Authors:  Sara N Lim; Anil K Pradhan; Rolf F Barth; Sultana N Nahar; Robin J Nakkula; Weilian Yang; Alycia M Palmer; Claudia Turro; Michael Weldon; Erica Hlavin Bell; Xiaokui Mo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 6.  Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Malignant Gliomas: A Review of Toxicity and Efficacy.

Authors:  Minghan Shi; Léon Sanche
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.